The Russians Are Coming, The Russians Are Coming!

vantexan

Well-Known Member
What's there to defend?

Forget the article, it's clear that the Trump Organization is benefiting from the fact that Trump is President.

Do you disagree?
The article was posted here as proof of malfeasance. Further examination shows they're just putting out misinformation, they don't really know what is going on at Trump's place. Pretty emblematic of what's been going on since last November.
 

BrownArmy

Well-Known Member
The article was posted here as proof of malfeasance. Further examination shows they're just putting out misinformation, they don't really know what is going on at Trump's place. Pretty emblematic of what's been going on since last November.

Nothing you're saying makes any sense.

Trump and his crew are making mad money off of Trumps' Presidency.

End of story.

And, by the way, if that's the fact, fine.

Turns out that's not illegal (allegedly).

Ok.

In which case, what's the problem?

What are you defending?
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
The article was posted here as proof of malfeasance. Further examination shows they're just putting out misinformation, they don't really know what is going on at Trump's place. Pretty emblematic of what's been going on since last November.
Not malfeasance. Less than ethical but that won't concern you.
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
Some food for thought...

Trump back and Tweeting...gained 5m followers (bots) in past few days.
Congress would like to talk to his lawyer, Cohen
Decidedly cool relations with Great Britain, Germany and France
Most of Steele dossier confirmed by multiple sources


Is there something big about to drop?

suddenly the democrats who allegedly want to get to the bottom of this as quickly as possible are delaying the Carter Page testimony.

Trump blasts Russia probe, urges testimony from former adviser Page
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Nothing you're saying makes any sense.

Trump and his crew are making mad money off of Trumps' Presidency.

End of story.

And, by the way, if that's the fact, fine.

Turns out that's not illegal (allegedly).

Ok.

In which case, what's the problem?

What are you defending?
If you'll examine the article, you'll come to the point where it says something to the effect that knowing how lobbyists are in Washington, you know this is likely to be happening. Buried in the details was their "out" to keep them out of trouble. There's nothing there but conjecture. And this is the stuff y'all are defending as fact. James Clapper, Diane Feinstein, and Maxine Waters are all on video admitting when asked directly that they've seen no evidence of collusion. This is all designed by the Left to destroy Trump. Julian Assange absolutely denies leaked emails came from Russia. He came very close to admitting Seth Rich was the source the other day when he said his sources were all worried about being killed, that a DNC staffer got killed. When asked if that staffer was the source of the leaks he got a funny look and said he never revealed sources. There's no proof, trumped up lies, pun intended.
 
Top