yes you doWe have to fund our retirement somehow
yes you doWe have to fund our retirement somehow
Bruh hate to break it to you but the hybrids will be doing the morning work, you’ll be doing the late pickups and your start time will be 11:30am
And how exactly.... is the company going to get around Article 40, and supplemental
language such as Maintenance of Standards ?
-Bug-
We have to fund our retirement somehBasically, they will never end overtime for package car drivers. The new harassment and 9.5 language will give the members options. This 22.4 will as well, whenever it gets ratified. Remember this, Every package car on the road costs more in insurance, gas, and upsets their stops per car. If you are a package car driver who wants the hours you'll get them.
That's where most of my overtime goes towards.yes you do
To bad that overtime isn't factored in the pensions. Its's for this reason that overtime for package car drivers will never go away.We have to fund our retirement someh
That's where most of my overtime goes towards.
To cover their arse on article 37! If your argument held any water at all they would actually lift a finger to fix a 9.5 issue on a Friday of a driver who had been violated less than twice that week. But they don't, because they don't care, because article 37 doesn't come into play!OT is a consideration. Why do you think your sups come down with the whole “no one past 9.5. If you are, you need to message the center” crap?
Now don’t get me wrong, dispatch certainly factors in OT into the routes they build, but certainly the trend would spike downward if they can do it and make a profit.
You need to think this one through a bit. The company won't violate and pay because the hybrid drivers are exempt from those protections and as such the company is free to abuse them at will!I sat thru the proposal meeting and have heard endless complaints about hours worked and weekend work,9.5,9.5,9.5,that's clearly what the members where most concerned with.the drivers said the 9.5 language does not mean that the company should violate and pay the penalty.now they wont.
Is there start time protection language I’m unaware of?
"The Employer agrees that all conditions of employment in his/her individual operation relating to wages, hours of work, overtime differentials and general working conditions shall be maintained at not less than the highest standards in effect at the time of the signing of this Agreement"
Everyone is getting in a big huff.... over nothing.
Is there start time protection language I’m unaware of?
There's language in the Central Region.
"If, during the life of this Agreement, a driver’s bid area is permanently changed by fifty percent (50%) or more of the total stops, start time change of more than one (1) hour or a change of fifty percent (50%) or more of the area or loop, he/she shall have the right to follow whichever portion of his/her bid area he/she desires or he/she will have the option to bump a junior driver in accordance with local seniority practices."
Also Maintenance of Standards:
"The Employer agrees that all conditions of employment in his/her individual operation relating to wages, hours of work, overtime differentials and general working conditions shall be maintained at not less than the highest standards in effect at the time of the signing of this Agreement"
https://teamster.org/sites/teamster.org/files/06242014_77983_central_region-final.pdf
Everyone is getting in a big huff.... over nothing.
-Bug-
I wish everyone thought this wayQuote from member Undertow. If the union and company were serious about using hybrids to ease the overloaded dispatch, then present a clause that has irrefutable 9.5 language on one end and iron clad protection forbidding exploitation of hybrids up to 70 hours on the other. Until that happens, I'd refuse it right there regardless of whatever other issues they claim to have "fixed".
And offer overtime and extra work to Regular Package Car Drivers first, and then offer the OT to 22.4 hybrid combination drivers.
This way the people who want the OT can get it. Those (whether they are RPCD or 22.4 hybrid drivers) who want to spend more time with their families will have that option.
Why would anyone think that having a new hybrid driver with a family work up to 70 hours with NO 9.5 PROTECTION EVER is good for that drivers family time?
When there are RPCD's who still want the OT because their kids have already moved out, etc. They already missed most of their kids weekday extracurricular activities over the last 15 years. Why penalize the drivers who have already sacrificed by losing that precious time?
Offer OT to Full Time Package Car Drivers first, then offer it to Air Drivers, and then offer it to 22.4s. If staffing needs are not met, then force in reverse order.
Why is it so difficult to get this common sense language into the Contract?
I had this thought too a week or so ago. I was thinking about a hybrid day you could bid on to for rpcds instead of having hybrid drivers. Or maybe a designated hours only day once a week with a 4 hour guarantee and not to exceed 6. Helps reduce ot while management doesn't have to worry about someone's guaranteed 8 and gets the earlyI have suggestion. 8hr work for one driver per week. This way hybrid will have work and RPCD will get overtime and a designated day to spend more time with family.
If so, lets just put in in writing. All extra work and OT shall 1st be offered to Full Time Package drivers and then offered to 22.4 drivers. This language would not affect any Full Time Package car driver who does not want OT.
Pretty simple language. The excessive OT issue a minority of drivers addressed does
not justify taking all rights to OT away from Full Time Drivers who want it.
It is just a sneaky omission that the Teamsters are not telling drivers.
This post would be more comforting if contract violations went more in favor to us workers. But more often than not it goes to UPS or at best they get a slap on the wrist 3 months down the road.There's language in the Central Region.
"If, during the life of this Agreement, a driver’s bid area is permanently changed by fifty percent (50%) or more of the total stops, start time change of more than one (1) hour or a change of fifty percent (50%) or more of the area or loop, he/she shall have the right to follow whichever portion of his/her bid area he/she desires or he/she will have the option to bump a junior driver in accordance with local seniority practices."
Also Maintenance of Standards:
"The Employer agrees that all conditions of employment in his/her individual operation relating to wages, hours of work, overtime differentials and general working conditions shall be maintained at not less than the highest standards in effect at the time of the signing of this Agreement"
https://teamster.org/sites/teamster.org/files/06242014_77983_central_region-final.pdf
Everyone is getting in a big huff.... over nothing.
-Bug-
This post would be more comforting if contract violations went more in favor to us workers. But more often than not it goes to UPS or at best they get a slap on the wrist 3 months down the road.There's language in the Central Region.
"If, during the life of this Agreement, a driver’s bid area is permanently changed by fifty percent (50%) or more of the total stops, start time change of more than one (1) hour or a change of fifty percent (50%) or more of the area or loop, he/she shall have the right to follow whichever portion of his/her bid area he/she desires or he/she will have the option to bump a junior driver in accordance with local seniority practices."
Also Maintenance of Standards:
"The Employer agrees that all conditions of employment in his/her individual operation relating to wages, hours of work, overtime differentials and general working conditions shall be maintained at not less than the highest standards in effect at the time of the signing of this Agreement"
https://teamster.org/sites/teamster.org/files/06242014_77983_central_region-final.pdf
Everyone is getting in a big huff.... over nothing.
-Bug-
"Highest standards" is subjective. What one side says it is may not be what the other side interprets!
As for the start times. Start times have been moved back another 10 mins the past few weeks. Contract is voted on and they move them 55 mins back. That is less than an hour. Driver start times are suddenly 5 mins before 10 am.
Once we vote yes do you think we can say, "ops, our bad, didn't want that so lets redo or you change?"
They are here plus dbl shifting due to the major turnover ratio of employees.Clerks, 22.3, and car washers are not allowed to work OT where I’m at
Why do you suppose they replaced S O'Brien?BS, I have been with the company for close to 2 decades and not once was OT ever a consideration in anything they did. NOT ONCE! The company wanted a cheaper labor force and Dennis said here, "let me bend over for you!"
Mine personally? No, I work too slow and don’t do enough stops. Lol.I understand what you are saying with the people doing your job for less an hour. Here is my question. Do you really think UPS will ever actually take your overtime away, as a package car driver?
They are here plus dbl shifting due to the major turnover ratio of employees.
People always show up here but it's not a hub setting.Sad part is, they hang intent sheets for double shifting and 3/4 of the people
don't show up for the second shift. Guess what happens ? Supes working....