Now the real truth, Both did get paid while on non working 72, and the reason was because this is what UPS management wanted. They did not ask both drivers or even give them an option to work or not. (this comes direct from the Driver) The business agent accepted managements terms without incident. Something that only our weak E board would do. This action does officially prove they are not protecting the members and do not have the members in there best interest.
Well I do agree that the drivers should have been working until the hearing BUT the BA is not in the office when the drivers are put on the 72 , funny how I've heard stewards in Foster say "who cares as long as there getting paid" but so say that there not being protected and have the members best interest is a JOKE
Thank you for the answer, UPS said to Anthony C and the E board, Do us a favor, we are going to fire these 2 drivers, and because your steward in Melville took a fall and is on work mens comp, we dont want these drivers or others to go on comp too the same way. So Anthony C agreed with management and said as long as they get paid its ok.. WTF - So our E Board gave up our protection rights and allowed UPS to do what they wanted.
There you go sounding like a management person that you are. Tell me what stops a member from falling after the 72 , what stops a member from falling in the locker room , what stops a member from falling in the parking lot , what stops a member from falling at the hearing , NOTHING
THIS IS WHY YOU ARE A SUPERVISOR BECAUSE THATS HOW THEY THINK..........