MAKAVELI
Well-Known Member
That's what Drumpf says......Its on the internet--it must be true
That's what Drumpf says......Its on the internet--it must be true
Which indicates that you and I approach real life situations a bit differently at certain times.Even one innocent person on death row is 'a lot'.
In this case the only reason to support the state killing people is emotional. It's not an effective detterent for crime so it's only purpose is vengance, an emotional response.Which indicates that you and I approach real life situations a bit differently at certain times.
I tend to push emotion down when I evaluate a situation ... not saying doing so is better ... just different.
"Choke me in the shallow waters before I get too deep"
?
Even one innocent person on death row is 'a lot'.
I agree!In this case the only reason to support the state killing people is emotional. It's not an effective deterrent for crime so it's only purpose is vengeance, an emotional response.
This is where I get lost with proponents of the death penalty. On one hand many supporters will decry the failures of the judiciary, then on the other they are willing to grant them the authority to kill. So many conservatives claim the government is corrupt but are in favor of that corrupt institution killing their fellow citizens as if in this one instance there are no potential faults in the system.The "noble idea of justice" is lost on the 9th Circuit court of appeals.
Sorry, it's hard to tell with you sometimes and I was too lazy to go back in the thread.I agree!
I tend to look at costs and effectiveness and efficiency.
My previous posts indicate this and I voted "NO".
The person is found guilty by a jury first....usuallyThis is where I get lost with proponents of the death penalty. On one hand many supporters will decry the failures of the judiciary, then on the other they are willing to grant them the authority to kill. So many conservatives claim the government is corrupt but are in favor of that corrupt institution killing their fellow citizens as if in this one instance there are no potential faults in the system.
What's your point? Jurys can be wrong. There are plenty of cases that have been overturned. The state should not be administering final solutions. You can't bring someone back to life if you mess up.The person is found guilty by a jury first....usually
And so many liberals feel big government is the answer to everything except the military, border control, and criminal justice.This is where I get lost with proponents of the death penalty. On one hand many supporters will decry the failures of the judiciary, then on the other they are willing to grant them the authority to kill. So many conservatives claim the government is corrupt but are in favor of that corrupt institution killing their fellow citizens as if in this one instance there are no potential faults in the system.
And so many liberals feel big government is the answer to everything except the military, border control, and criminal justice.
"Every prison cell should be outfitted with a ceiling noose. Why should the convicts be forced to use dirty bed sheets to off themselves?"
You should gladly pay double taxation to achieve those ends to prove to everyone how committed you are to such an idea.
not my idea.... notice how I quoted the statement?
Trump does.You probably believe politicians don't lie either.
That's another thing....how the heck does someone get to 400 lbs on prison food? Lol.
That looks disgusting.View attachment 130663
Nutraloaf.