As in “we” are going to have to pay for it.Who's "we"?
We have a spending problem. We have for at least 40 years. We knowExcept the tax cuts have resulted in more government revenue, not less. We don't have a every problem, we have a spending problem.
Greenspan? Recently?Greenspan recently did an interview. In that interview he says:. Regulations are way overboard that has stifled innovation and new business creation. Also the Feds have to cut spending and entitlements. He emphasized, I'm not referring too social security and Medicare.
Are you sure about that?Except the tax cuts have resulted in more government revenue, not less. We don't have a every problem, we have a spending problem.
And that’s China’s leverage. They can wait Trump out.China has its own systemic issues and depends very much on U.S. trade. That's the leverage Trump has in negotiations. And as the saying goes Rome wasn't built in a day. It took decades to get us where we are and it'll take time for us to be rebuilt. That's a glaring difference between us and China. We want immediate results, driven by quarterly reports. China is on a long range plan to improve everything.
They are where we are as well.Africa, South China Sea. Just about any place we aren't they are.
I’d say the USA National Government has a spending problem mostly.Are you sure about that?
I was talking about the increased revenueI’d say the USA National Government has a spending problem mostly.
Greenspan? Recently?
I was talking about the increased spending.I was talking about the increased revenue
Uh yup, I do.Do you even Google?
Nobody was disputing the spending. Wondering about the supposed increased revenue.I was talking about the increased spending.
That along with a president for life is why they can and will wait us out.China has its own systemic issues and depends very much on U.S. trade. That's the leverage Trump has in negotiations. And as the saying goes Rome wasn't built in a day. It took decades to get us where we are and it'll take time for us to be rebuilt. That's a glaring difference between us and China. We want immediate results, driven by quarterly reports. China is on a long range plan to improve everything.
Except to the people who wanted to work and couldn't get a job under Obama.Nobody was disputing the spending. Wondering about the supposed increased revenue.
Not that it matters. If the increased revenue doesn’t offset the tax cut, plus pay begin paying down the debt, it’s a failure.
We have a spending problem. We have for at least 40 years. We know
It and yet insist on cutting taxes, never spending, and blaming the other side. That’s just stupid.
I’d say the USA National Government has a spending problem mostly.
OKI was talking about the increased revenue
Until we start hitting the rounds of 700,000 job losses per month.Except to the people who wanted to work and couldn't get a job under Obama.
Now they got a job and off the government dole.
I know you would rejoice in that!Until we start hitting the rounds of 700,000 job losses per month.