Gun control advocates in Ferguson MO
- Thread starter soberups
- Start date
realbrown1
Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
Couldn't have said it better myself.
realbrown1
Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
Total BS. She has a personal racial agenda to promote.
She assumes she knows what the officer involved in the shooting was doing while talking to another officer and she couldn't possible know what they were talking about.
I wonder how much she is making for these interviews?
Last edited:
@2:26..... "at my point of view, I couldn't see what was going on"
thanks CNN for nothing from 2:26 to 3:30
MAKAVELI
Well-Known Member
I guess you missed the part where she says she saw Brown get away and Wilson chasing after him and shooting.
when was the last time you seen or heard of a police officer trying to arrest somebody through the window of a vehicle?
the only things I hear her say are, " I think, I believe, looks like, it seems, another I think according to autopsy report, I'm guessing, I heard"
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
What eyewitness said Brown was bullrushing the cop?
oldngray
nowhere special
It matches the cop's statement which was made before any forensic evidence was available to support him. So far none of the evidence has contradicted the cop and while there could be alternate explanations they would have to prove the events occurred differently and not just suggest the possibility to convict Wilson of a crime. I think there was a bullrush witness but I'm not sure about that. Most of the other witnesses that contradicted Wilson's statements have had problems matching the physical evidence. Physical evidence is by far the most reliable vs eyewitnesses. The autopsy paid for by Browns family was inconclusive other that ruling out being shot in the back. It did allow the possibility that Brown was surrendering but also supported Wilson's statement so did not prove anything other than to discredit the witnesses who said Brown was shot in the back. The investigation is still continuing of course but nothing stands out so far to prove anything yet.
realbrown1
Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
I thought all the witnesses said he was shot in th he back, or had his arms raised?
You just can't trust racially motivated anti-cop eye witnesses.
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
So in other words, there are no eyewitnesses that say he bumrushed the cop. All of them say he was surrendering, and so far, the evidence doesn't refute that.
realbrown1
Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
Are you talking about Ferguson or Fantasyland?
You members of the TROLL PATROL really need to be more specific.
But if he was surrendering, why weren't his hands above his head?
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
The forensics so far don't disprove that they were.
realbrown1
Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
As far as I'm concerned, he got justice.
Don't live as a thug and you might live a long life.
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
What makes you think they weren't? Let's see how many times you can dodge this question.
upsgrunt
Well-Known Member
If his hands were above his head, do you think the cop took aim that high, and put numerous shots in that narrow of a target? Police training is center mass, or as close as you can get. I'm fairly positive that he didn't aim high and left just to hit his arm.
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
Yet he hit him twice in the head.... and never hit him at all center mass.
What I find curious is the police chief was saying day one the gun was fired in the car.... still no word on those forensics.
Last edited:
Mack Grant
Well-Known Member
Hey Monday-morning quarterback do a little research on the number of officers whove lost their lives in the line of duty in the last 5 years.
The criminal thug rips off a store 20 mins later he's dead. Poetic justice if you ask me.
Similar threads
