TOS, I think I know why you can't understand the difference between weapons .
You think that news reporters are honest , highly knowledgeable & truthful .
Very bad assumption .
With every story you should try to get info from different sources before coming to a conclusion.
In 2009, according to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, 66.9% of all homicides in the United States were perpetrated using a firearm. There were 52,447 deliberate and 23,237 accidental non-fatal gunshot injuries in the United States during 2000. Just over half of all gun-related deaths in the United States are suicides, with 17,352 (55.6%) of the total 31,224 firearm-related deaths in 2007 suicide deaths, and 12,632 (40.5%) homicide deaths. Some suicides are committed after the perpetrator has committed one or more murders.
Look bro, assault weapons are just that, assault weapons. Only a gun nut would try to describe a military style weapon as a squirrel shooter.
I asked before, and NOT one of you would answer the question, "where is your red line with civilian deaths that would cause you to reconsider some form of gun control"...?
Its clear that 11 thousand deaths a year are fine with YOU and the other supporters of guns. But, what number is TOO HIGH for you each year?
25K ? 50K ? 100K ? 1 Million?
Where will you reach your limit and call for some kind of gun control?
It appears that as long as its someone else's life that is taken then human deaths are fine with you. YOU and the others can see dozens of people killed or shot in a movie theatre and yet, be absolutely fine with the weapons, ammo and accessories the shooter had with him and then describe those weapons as squirrel shooters.
This country's gun culture have become OBSESSIVE with guns, and having more guns that is necessary is a SICKNESS and not a hobby.
Eventually, that SICKNESS turns to violence. Its only a matter of time and circumstances.
Peace
TOS
Your link is the first I've seen that. I checked other sites that would have that on them and not a word. I like the including of pump shotguns, criminalizing lawful owners, and the targeting of shooting ranges. That's interesting because our local ranges is collectively run by the area law enforcement.
I wonder how many mass murders were committed with a hammer. Anyone got a guess?
I wonder how many mass murders were committed with a hammer. Anyone got a guess?
Oh. I thought we were trying to prevent mass murders like Sandyhook and Aurora. I haven't heard anyone speak of ending violence once and for all.
Shouldn't the focus be on what has the greatest benefit? Sandyhook and aurora are both the exception, not the rule. If saving peoples lives is really the goal then focusing on where the most lives are lost makes most sense to me. If you want to focus on Sandy hook and Aurora then mental health practices is where the focus should be since both were perpetrated by people with severe mental deficiencies that had not been addressed properly.
I've always advocated for the mental health aspect. I just think ridiculous forays into issues other than gun violence are done only to muddy the waters. And on the day when somebody takes a nail gun into an elementary school and masacres 26 individuals, I will see the point you are trying to make. I don't know why the psychos choose fire arms. But that is the world we live in.