guns

728ups

All Trash No Trailer
(CNN) -- After Tuesday's shooting at an Oregon high school, many media outlets, including CNN, reported that there have been 74 school shootings in the past 18 months.
The statistic came from a group called Everytown for Gun Safety, an umbrella group started by former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, a passionate and public advocate of gun control.
So on Wednesday, CNN took a closer look at the list, delving into the circumstances of each incident Everytown included.
CNN determined that 15 of the incidents Everytown included were situations similar to the violence in Newtown or Oregon -- a minor or adult actively shooting inside or near a school.
Some of the other incidents on Everytown's list included personal arguments, accidents and alleged gang activities and drug deals
http://www.cnn.com/2014/06/11/us/school-shootings-cnn-number/index.html
a quick glance thru the local news agencies show these shooting REALLY happened. trying to use Orwellians 1984 styled Realspeak wont make them go away
 

728ups

All Trash No Trailer
Similarly mentally deficient people should be tested before being allowed to vote. Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. Such as with liberal attempts at gun control that repeatedly fail.
i dont see the mentally deficient killing people with votes
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
It cannot possibly be correct. Schools are "gun free zones". There are signs on the doors saying "no guns allowed". Must be a mistake.
And since the number proved incorrect, maybe, just maybe the guns free zone does have an effect. Think of it as the difference between premeditated murder and manslaughter. Columbine would be an example of premeditated, manslaughter would be heated arguments getting way out of control and resulting in a "crime of passion". While gun free zones won't stop the former, it probably greatly reduces instances of the latter.
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
1. Minors do not have full Constitutional rights and never have. They cannot vote, they cannot own property or enter into legally binding contracts, they cannot drink alcohol, and they cannot buy or own guns. No rational person would suggest giving minors all of these rights and no rational person would suggest that giving guns to teenagers would make schools safer.
'
2. Every single mass shooting that has occurred in a school or mall or theater has been premeditated. The shooter never intended to obey the laws that require these places to be "gun free" zones. The only people who did obey the law became unarmed victims of the criminals who didn't.

3. Comparing drinking and driving to allowing guns in public places is a false analogy. An otherwise law-abiding person who drives under the influence is a danger to everyone around him on the road. A law-abiding person who carries a firearm is not.

4. The people who cling to the fantasy of "gun free zones" as a solution have the false belief that the gun is responsible for murders when in fact the responsibility lies with the criminal who wields it. A gun is an inanimate object. Possession of a gun does not cause an otherwise law-abiding person to become a criminal. Those who break the laws against committing murder will also break the laws against being armed in "gun free zones", causing those who obey the law to be helpless against them.
A quick google found that Vermont allows conceal carry at age 16...by definition a minor.
 

soberups

Pees in the brown Koolaid
And since the number proved incorrect, maybe, just maybe the guns free zone does have an effect. Think of it as the difference between premeditated murder and manslaughter. Columbine would be an example of premeditated, manslaughter would be heated arguments getting way out of control and resulting in a "crime of passion". While gun free zones won't stop the former, it probably greatly reduces instances of the latter.
I am not suggesting that we should allow anyone who wants to to carry guns in schools.

What I am suggesting...is that we have trained, armed responders in the schools instead of miles away in a patrol car.

Any teacher or staff member who wants to should be allowed to obtain a concealed handgun permit and to undergo training so that our kids have at least some measure of protection while they are in the classroom.
 

soberups

Pees in the brown Koolaid
A quick google found that Vermont allows conceal carry at age 16...by definition a minor.
And yet gun crimes are virtually unheard of there, and their violent crime rate is a fraction of Chicago's...a city with a virtual ban on legal gun ownership.

How strange.
 

soberups

Pees in the brown Koolaid
As i stated earlier: I have sent copies of your posts to friends of mine who actually WERE Black Voters in 1950 and took part in the Civil Rights movement and aside from giving them a very good laugh they felt it was sad that you cannot see the difference between the two issues.

Good for them.

A black man who lived in Alabama in 1960 had the right to vote according to the 15th Amendment of the Constitution. However...he was totally prevented from exercising that right by poll taxes, literacy tests, and other "reasonable, common sense" restrictions that were put in place by whites with the specific intention of disenfranchising blacks.

Law abiding people in cities like Chicago and Washington DC have faces similar "reasonable, common sense" obstacles when trying to exercise their 2nd Amendment rights. It took a Supreme Court ruling to force Chicago and Washington DC to allow their residents to keep handguns in their own homes for protection, a right that is still restricted by odious and expensive licensing requirements.
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
And yet gun crimes are virtually unheard of there, and their violent crime rate is a fraction of Chicago's...a city with a virtual ban on legal gun ownership.

How strange.
Vermont = Chicago...how strange. I bet I'd never mistake Vermont for Chicago.
 

MAKAVELI

Well-Known Member
Vermont = Chicago...how strange. I bet I'd never mistake Vermont for Chicago.
The population in the whole state of Vermont doesn't equal Chicago's population and he wants to compare the two? Anyone with common sense would understand the correlation between crime/violence and population/density.
 

728ups

All Trash No Trailer
And yet gun crimes are virtually unheard of there, and their violent crime rate is a fraction of Chicago's...a city with a virtual ban on legal gun ownership.

How strange.
No, what is strange is comparing Apples and Oranges and trying to act like you have valid point.
The population of Chicago is 2,695,5989 (http://suburbanstats.org/population/illinois/how-many-people-live-in-chicago) and the population of the entire state of Vermont is 625,741 (http://suburbanstats.org/population/how-many-people-live-in-vermont)
Based on populations ,as well as size Vermont is 9,614 sq m compared to Chicago being 234 sq miles it's not strange at all that Chicago should have much more gun crime.

and yes, Gun Laws are very strict in Chicago as the right loves to point out. What isnt pointed out is that many many of the guns in Chicago are brought into the city from states with low to no gun laws such as Georgia(surpirse surprise)
http://www.cityofchicago.org/conten...ess Releases/2014/May/05.27.14TracingGuns.pdf
 

728ups

All Trash No Trailer
Here is an article regarding the smuggling of weapons from Georgia to NYC and the deaths that occur from it

Death rides the Iron Pipeline
Georgia's lax gun laws help criminals here kill


Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/death-rides-iron-pipeline-article-1.1801004#ixzz34eUmmwYk

here are some excerpts from the article


Last month, Georgia passed what is being called a “guns everywhere” bill that makes it even harder to keep firearms out of the hands of dangerous people — going so far as to repeal the system that had let the state’s licensing department pull licenses from rogue dealers who had been found guilty of criminal or fraudulent activity.

And that was just the latest in Georgia gun laws. The state has no criminal penalties for straw purchasers who buy firearms for those banned from doing so themselves. It doesn’t require background checks for people purchasing guns from unlicensed dealers, including at gun shows and online. It doesn’t even require gun owners to file a police report if their guns are lost or stolen.

Laws like these have made the state a favorite point of purchase for gun traffickers, with guns sold in Georgia ending up used in crimes elsewhere at more than twice the national average.

Georgians also suffer as a result of their laws. The state gun murder rate is 27% higher than the national average. Women there are shot to death by intimate partners 52% more often than the national average, and 97% more often than in states that require a background check for handgun sales.

Something needs to be done to curb gun violence, and background check legislation is the top priority. We won’t continue to wait for legislators in Washington — we are passing legislation in states across the country that will make it harder for dangerous people to get their hands on guns.

Currently, 16 states require background checks — and these laws make a difference. In Colorado alone, the new background check law has stopped 160 people banned from buying a gun from getting their hands on one. Other states need to follow suit.

Georgia is not the only feeder state of illegal guns. Guns from Indiana and Mississippi travel into Chicago, while Virginia and the Carolinas also feed guns here.

Just last August, the NYPD announced the largest gun-trafficking takedown in its history when more than 250 guns from North and South Carolina were seized after arriving in New York City. Like Georgia, these states are not doing their part to make it more difficult for criminals to get their hands on guns.

New York is doing its part. Strong laws requiring background checks for all sales, along with proactive policing and tough sentencing guidelines for illegal gun possession, have made it incredibly difficult for criminals to buy guns here. And as a result, shootings and murders-by-gun have reached record lows.

But even more New Yorkers could be spared from injury or death with stronger laws in other jurisdictions. When it comes to relations between states, strong background check laws make good neighbors.



Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/death-rides-iron-pipeline-article-1.1801004#ixzz34eVGPIII
 

oldngray

nowhere special
Fair enough--- how 'bout we compare Chicago and NYC? Crime, especially gun related, is down considerably in NYC.

NYC was down but is creeping back up since they quit stop and frisk. And since almost all guns are illegal there there would be little to no gun violence if the people just obeyed all of those laws that were passed.
 

728ups

All Trash No Trailer
Good for them.

A black man who lived in Alabama in 1960 had the right to vote according to the 15th Amendment of the Constitution. However...he was totally prevented from exercising that right by poll taxes, literacy tests, and other "reasonable, common sense" restrictions that were put in place by whites with the specific intention of disenfranchising blacks.

Law abiding people in cities like Chicago and Washington DC have faces similar "reasonable, common sense" obstacles when trying to exercise their 2nd Amendment rights. It took a Supreme Court ruling to force Chicago and Washington DC to allow their residents to keep handguns in their own homes for protection, a right that is still restricted by odious and expensive licensing requirements.
stop while you are behind,really.
you keep trying to compare the two situations and while you gave us all a very good laugh to start off with it's now becoming both sad and on the verge of insulting those who were killed demanding equality,who had crosses burned in their yards,whose houses were firebombed,who had dogs turned on them by the police when they assembled peacefully,and who had a government at every turn denying them Equal Rights. when this stuff starts happening to the Open Carry people, maybe you'll have a point
 
Last edited:

728ups

All Trash No Trailer
The population in the whole state of Vermont doesn't equal Chicago's population and he wants to compare the two? Anyone with common sense would understand the correlation between crime/violence and population/density.
yep the biggest city in Vermont is Burlington with a population of 42,000.
 
Top