oldngray
nowhere special
It looks like their dream is to imitate North Korea.
guns
- Thread starter moreluck
- Start date
It looks like their dream is to imitate North Korea.
728ups
All Trash No Trailer
nah i dont subscribe to such Orewllian thoughts.
ya'll really cant see the irony of people being shot at gun shows can you?
728ups
All Trash No Trailer
oldngray
nowhere special
Is that one of those eagles killed by windmills?
brett636
Well-Known Member
The arguments you are making this thread suggest otherwise.
oldngray
nowhere special
Despite your own unique interpretation the Supreme Court has ruled differently. You need to improve your reading comprehension, or at least listen to what the courts have already said it means.
Last edited:
All these experts on the second amendment and NOT one of you can explain the second amendment. I enjoy watching you all avoid the questions.
TOS.
TOS.
The bill of rights contains this..
Fifth Article: A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the People, being the best security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed, but no one religiously scrupulous of bearing arms, shall be compelled to render military service in person.
This is clearly a MILITARY clause. A well regulated militia COMPOSED of the people (making it a military rendering)
The right of the people ( in the militia ) to keep and bear arms, shall not be prevented.
The last part clarifies the military meaning... "no one religiously scrupulous of bearing arms....shall be compelled to render military service in person ( in the MILITIA)
I dont know where anyone reads PRIVATE PERSONS in this?
I dont see where rednecks with gun racks, or nutballs with assault rifles is included in this article?
I dont ONE stand alone sentence that describes the private person in this article.
I see the PREAMBLE "A well regulated militia"... and everything after the first comma having to do with the MILITIA.
Its simple english and sentence structure.
Taking one fragment out of this paragraph and giving it a separate meaning is silly at best.
TOS.
Fifth Article: A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the People, being the best security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed, but no one religiously scrupulous of bearing arms, shall be compelled to render military service in person.
This is clearly a MILITARY clause. A well regulated militia COMPOSED of the people (making it a military rendering)
The right of the people ( in the militia ) to keep and bear arms, shall not be prevented.
The last part clarifies the military meaning... "no one religiously scrupulous of bearing arms....shall be compelled to render military service in person ( in the MILITIA)
I dont know where anyone reads PRIVATE PERSONS in this?
I dont see where rednecks with gun racks, or nutballs with assault rifles is included in this article?
I dont ONE stand alone sentence that describes the private person in this article.
I see the PREAMBLE "A well regulated militia"... and everything after the first comma having to do with the MILITIA.
Its simple english and sentence structure.
Taking one fragment out of this paragraph and giving it a separate meaning is silly at best.
TOS.
BigUnionGuy
Got the T-Shirt
" No regrets." That's how Rick Rogers says he felt after he shot and killed 40 year old Kenneth Fry. Police say Fry and several others broke into Rogers' home early Saturday morning. "
http://www.ky3.com/news/local/resid...nvasion-intruder-speaks-out/21048998_26820188
Illinois --(Ammoland.com)- The shrill voice of extremism echoed through the halls of the Niles Community Center on Monday night as the Bloomberg Moms tried without success to block a special use permit that would allow a pistol range and gun shop to open in an industrial area of the village.
Read more: http://www.ammoland.com/2014/07/l-z...erical-anti-gun-bloomberg-moms/#ixzz377EbF7BO
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook
"In order to avoid “yearly budget crises,” Miami-Dade County (Florida) may have to fire hundreds of police officers as part of a long-term budget strategy announced earlier this week. The proposal has been met with some criticism, with one police association spokesman telling citizens to “get yourself some firearms because you’re going to have to protect yourselves.”
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/201...se-youre-going-to-have-to-protect-yourselves/
http://www.ky3.com/news/local/resid...nvasion-intruder-speaks-out/21048998_26820188
Illinois --(Ammoland.com)- The shrill voice of extremism echoed through the halls of the Niles Community Center on Monday night as the Bloomberg Moms tried without success to block a special use permit that would allow a pistol range and gun shop to open in an industrial area of the village.
Read more: http://www.ammoland.com/2014/07/l-z...erical-anti-gun-bloomberg-moms/#ixzz377EbF7BO
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook
"In order to avoid “yearly budget crises,” Miami-Dade County (Florida) may have to fire hundreds of police officers as part of a long-term budget strategy announced earlier this week. The proposal has been met with some criticism, with one police association spokesman telling citizens to “get yourself some firearms because you’re going to have to protect yourselves.”
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/201...se-youre-going-to-have-to-protect-yourselves/
I agree, but that's not how it usually comes down. That proposition is very, very expensive and would mean steep tax hikes. At that point, many decide that maybe we should just take our chances.
I met a guy today exercising his right to carry today. Actually, it was the second time I met him. First time I thought he was just a paranoid goofball. But this time I talked to him and in a few short moments started feeling sorry for him. He's frail, arm in a cast, and just recently had a pacemaker put in. I couldn't help but think maybe he's right to carry. I mean honestly, if I meant to do him harm, I'd only give him maybe 20% chance of doing anything to defend even with the gun. But if the day comes when he mistakes a youth soccer player for any threat beyond being the noisy jerks they can be, I'm not listening to any, "I felt threatened" crap. Think about what a subjective and low bar that can be. Nice guy though.
Bringdough
Well-Known Member
It's amazing for you to read something in the constitution that up until about the 1930s was well know .
If you take time to read the federalist papers you would see that the people should be armed to fight off a oppressive govt., if need be.
If they meant to says the rights of the people in the militia, they would have wrote that.
Sent using BrownCafe App
"youth soccer player" now... great... smh again
huh?
BigUnionGuy
Got the T-Shirt
Sizing up your next victim ??
Think again.
http://www.wyff4.com/news/1-dead-1-...ute/26775334?_escaped_fragment_=99Qek#!bcD6lo
"My baby didn't do nuffin"
how about "youth soccer player who might be carrying and might want to start some sheet"
two scenarios
Yeah, I do have a problem with the Zimmerman defense when one of two eye witnesses is dead because the other one shot him. But then again Zimmerman's life is sufficiently screwed by his own actions.
Before I can answer that, you'll have to remind me who my previous victims were.
Similar threads
