Illinois
Looks like you live in Somalia! Man, whatever you did in life to put you in a neighborhood where you have to keep ammo like this, I sure wouldnt spend one day there.
Nothing says "ghetto" more than a pile of high caliber ammo in a basement.
TOS.
This coming from someone who tries to interpret the meaning of the 2nd Amendment by quoting the Militia Act that was written 20 years later.What i find amusing, is how you cling to the second amendment, but when challenged to explain it, you and sober simply move on to another part of the founding documents and abandon the second amendment.
TOS.
This coming from someone who tries to interpret the 2nd Amendment by quoting the Militia Act that was written 20 years later.
I see 175 grains on the scale. You loading 30.06 with 150 grain bullets? The cases look too long to be .308 but its hard to tell in the photo.
Pull your panties out of your ass. That is ammo for an ordinary hunting rifle, maybe 50 or 60 rounds at the most which is the equivalent of 3 boxes. I keep more than that in the glove box of my Prius.Looks like you live in Somalia! Man, whatever you did in life to put you in a neighborhood where you have to keep ammo like this, I sure wouldnt spend one day there.
Nothing says "ghetto" more than a pile of high caliber ammo in a basement.
TOS.
Cases look too long to be .223 and the one on the scale weighs 175 grains which is too heavy to be .223 even with the weight of the bullet and brass combined.It appears to be 223. Congrats to Scratch on doing necked cartridges. The inside of my safe is very Ghetto and I wouldn't have it any other way. Practice makes perfect.
My understanding is the dimensions are the same, the shell brass is a little thicker in 5.56 to handle a hotter powder charge.
You see, I don't have a problem with any of that. I just have a problem believing you are the rule rather than the exception and I'm not in a hurry to have every person packing so that we can find out.
Search your numbers. They do lie. The statistics when correctly analyzed have never born out that conclusion. The one thing that has been a statistical fact is a slight increase in aggravated assaults in states that adopt RTC laws. You are riding numbers that have over time been on a decline despite RTC laws being passed and it's a phenomena that sociologists have been at a loss to explain. You may as well say that the drop in crime is a result of increased American obesity.In 2007 there were approximately 4.6 million Americans with concealed carry permits, and in that year there were 14,831 homicides, 10,086 of them using guns.
In 2012, the last year for which data is available, there were 11.1 million Americans with concealed carry permits...over twice as many as in 2007....yet homicides decreased to 12,765 and only 8,885 of them used guns.
Also, the 11.1 million figure does not include states like Arizona, Alaska and Vermont that allow concealed carry without a permit.
More guns, more people, fewer murders. The numbers don't lie.
Search your numbers. They do lie. The statistics when correctly analyzed have never born out that conclusion. The one thing that has been a statistical fact is a slight increase in aggravated assaults in states that adopt RTC laws. You are riding numbers that have over time been on a decline despite RTC laws being passed and it's a phenomena that sociologists have been at a loss to explain. You may as well say that the drop in crime is a result of increased American obesity.
it may be that crime decreases because of better policing, economic factors, and even more surveillance cameras. More guns, less crime is intellectually lazy.The numbers are proof that strict gun laws don't prevent crime. They are proof that the "availability of guns" doesn't increase gun crime. And if the number of people "packing" more than doubles in a 5 year period yet murder rates drop, your concerns about people like me being the exception rather than the rule are obviously unfounded.