"Why would ANYONE want to disarm a populace? Ask gun control advocates in industrialized Western nations – or California – and the answer is as simple as its is idiotic: for public safety."
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/20...-populace-theyre-lined-front-ravine-executed/
I don't know BUG, maybe stick to issues dealing with our Union?
This link you posted has zero to do with what's happening in our country. It's as idiotic as it is hyperbolic.
Let me ask you a question:
How many guns has our current administration taken away from law-abiding gun owners?
I don't know BUG, maybe stick to issues dealing with our Union?
This link you posted has zero to do with what's happening in our country.
I can see many legals problems for the police on this .A plan by police in Buffalo, N.Y., to begin confiscating the firearms of legal gun owners within days of their deaths is drawing fire from Second Amendment advocates
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/11/1...rms-at-home-after-funerals/?intcmp=latestnews
I can see many legals problems for the police on this .
All property of the deceased is still their property until probate of their will is completed . The Police may revoke the license of the deceased and only that .
And did you notice that the guns to be confiscated are ones that are legally registered? So much for the argument that registration isn't a precursor to confiscation.
What if she were a domestic violence victim who had taken out a restraining order on an abusive, crazy ex who was threatening to kill her and who had no intention of obeying that restraining order?
Someone who has threatened to kill someone should be in jail.
That Moonie headline hurt my eyes, and ears.Obama’s feds hid key data to get Calif. lead ammo ban passed in backdoor gun control move
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/dec/2/lead-ammunition-ban-passed-after-feds-withheld-key/
Good.That Moonie headline hurt my eyes, and ears.