moreluck
golden ticket member
You just called this an "Advil". Are you crazy? This is the picture that was posted....I think you are confused. Maybe you're an Advil, not an anvil. The GOP has lots of anvils (in high places).
You just called this an "Advil". Are you crazy? This is the picture that was posted....I think you are confused. Maybe you're an Advil, not an anvil. The GOP has lots of anvils (in high places).
You just called this an "Advil". Are you crazy? This is the picture that was posted....
What the hell ! Is she trying to seduce Cain ?
I know there are rumors in Texas, but c'mon!
Lets step back a moment and look at the situation in its entirety. These were events that took place over a decade ago. If I dug into your past and pulled out a warning letter you received in the late 90s would you be able to tell me exactly who, when, and why the situation took place on the spot? I thought not. Remember that Herman recused himself from the situation meaning he left the negotiating and the final decision up to the lawyers rather than up to him. He was not apart of any agreement so him not being able to recall a detail from an agreement that he was not a party too from over 12 years ago is perfectly acceptable and only highlights his humanity.
If I were running for President of These Here United States, I would be under the reasonable assumption that anything in my past could come back to haunt me and I would be prepared to deal with things in my past if they were brought up. Surely Cain had some recollection of the events and should have been prepared to answer consistently when the issue arose. If he can't answer consistently, he is either a liar or very very unprepared. Assuming the latter case, do you want someone who is unprepared, to be President???
If I were running for President of These Here United States, I would be under the reasonable assumption that anything in my past could come back to haunt me and I would be prepared to deal with things in my past if they were brought up. Surely Cain had some recollection of the events and should have been prepared to answer consistently when the issue arose. If he can't answer consistently, he is either a liar or very very unprepared. Assuming the latter case, do you want someone who is unprepared, to be President???
You left out the one assumption we all get under our constitution.... innocent until proven guilty. How does an innocent person prepare for false aqusations?
You left out the one assumption we all get under our constitution.... innocent until proven guilty. How does an innocent person prepare for false aqusations?
"....do you want someone who is unprepared, to be President??? "
We already have that person!!
He did admit a little later, that he does remember the settlement(s).
I reserve the right to revise and extend my remarks!
We don't care if he's an idiot, he's our idiot and he's tons better than their idoit!
A dead opossum would make a better President than what we have now. Herman's 9-9-9 plan shows he is very prepared to be President as he was the first candidate to have a solid and transparent plan on how to revise our nation's tax code which in itself is a huge burden on both business and consumers. To say Herman is unprepared for the office of the President simply because he can't recall details of an agreement he was not a party of is not a fair criticism to make.