Scottyhawk
What is it? A brown box. Duh
They do not give two craps about misloads it seems in my building, every truck is chock full of them and the only message I ever see is deliver them, big arrow down, Message accepted revised ETA 2200
Apparently now in my building..it's circle the PAL sticker AND write the HIN # on every package.The more corporate pushes the issue of writing sequence numbers (THAT ARE ALEADY ON THE PALs!) on the boxes the more misloads sky rocket. Not to mention load quality. This company wants to fail. That is the only logical explanation for their decisions.
They do that here too. I try not to look at my preloader in the morning before work because seeing him struggle to write all of that gibberish lets me know immediately that I will have a crappy load every day. Only when they are permitted to only look at the PAL and verify it matches the address label do I have a decent load. They aren't aloud to move the labels on days they are forced to write the numbers. The loads are such a cluster **** on those days.Apparently now in my building..it's circle the PAL sticker AND write the HIN # on every package.
I politely disagree. Depending on the shape of the box and where the PAL label was placed, writing the #s helps you double check for misloads. Obviously it's easier to load in the right order and then for drivers to locate packages if can easily see the PAL #.he more corporate pushes the issue of writing sequence numbers (THAT ARE ALEADY ON THE PALs!) on the boxes the more misloads sky rocket. Not to mention load quality.
Writing numbers is a waste of time and money (for crayons/Sharpies). A preloader comparing the address on the PAL against the shipping label address is far more affective at reducing misloads than forcing them to scribble numbers that many of us can't even read. Add the fact that we often end up with multiple address with the same sequence numbers and we end up with a nightmare of a load and more misloads to boot.I politely disagree. Depending on the shape of the box and where the PAL label was placed, writing the #s helps you double check for misloads. Obviously it's easier to load in the right order and then for drivers to locate packages if can easily see the PAL #.
THE VAST MAJORITY of DRIVERS DO NOT READ PAL #s TO LOCATE PACKAGES. They read the shipping labels.I politely disagree. Depending on the shape of the box and where the PAL label was placed, writing the #s helps you double check for misloads. Obviously it's easier to load in the right order and then for drivers to locate packages if can easily see the PAL #.
I actually use them some when the pals are actually faced for selection. But that is rare nowadays. I can actually read the printed numbers. I use them as a guide and will use the addresses whenever there are multiple address with the same sequence number. Lately I'll take the time to face PALs (peeling them to do so if need be) so that I don't have to deal with the chicken scratch and/or dyslexia sequence numbers that are written. In my center misloads go down and load quality goes up whenever our center manager or preload supervisors have the balls to let the preload do things right. Misloads skyrocket and load quality plummets when they go back to the chicken scratch method.THE VAST MAJORITY of DRIVERS DO NOT READ PAL #s TO LOCATE PACKAGES. They read the shipping labels.
A preloader comparing the address on the PAL against the shipping label address is far more affective at reducing misloads than forcing them to scribble numbers that many of us can't even read.
I always thought a misload was just loaded in the wrong spot in the right car and a misroute was a package loaded on the wrong car.effective
Comparing PAL to shipping label is called an out of sync. Misloads is putting a package on the wrong PC.
effective
Comparing PAL to shipping label is called an out of sync. Misloads is putting a package on the wrong PC.
Exactly....out of syncs still count as misolads.so, out of sync pal labels get misloaded... right
Exactly....out of syncs still count as misolads.
They shouldn't count as misolads against the laoder.Exactly....out of syncs still count as misolads.
They shouldn't count as misolads against the laoder.
If its not loaded where its supposed to be loaded ... its a misload. People can try to use other names for it but doesn't change what it is.
Actually misloads...formerly called "off routes"...are now known as WIWCs..... Walk In Wrong Cars
All so that the numbers on a report don't look as bad.