President Obama!

moreluck

golden ticket member
Re: Obamanomics

I understand the blame, but what has O done to reverse it, curtail it, stall it, etc??

He only spends, and spends unwisely. He promised to look at waste....and he has looked at it and watches it as it continues. Gee, I wonder if that little shrimp is off the treadmill yet?

You can go back 10 presidents on the deficit crap, but where does it get us?

We have Dems saying there is nothing to the 15 T. deficit....it doesn't matter.......quote from Bob Beckel.

To put that into perspective, when President George W. Bush took office, our national debt was $5.768 trillion. By the time Bush left office, it had nearly doubled, to $10.626 trillion. So Bush's record on deficit spending was not good at all: During his presidency, the national debt rose by an average of $607 billion a year. How does that compare to Obama? During Obama's presidency to date, the national debt has risen by an average of $1.723 trillion a year — or by a jaw-dropping $1.116 trillion more, per year, than it rose even under Bush.
 

MrFedEx

Engorged Member
Re: Obamanation here today


Let's see. When you have an obstructionist Congress that is more concerned about politics than our economy, what is the President to do? He isn't the first to do an end around move via Executive Orders, and he won't be the last.
It will be interesting to see how the House reacts when the 2012 vote is done and they will need to actually do something besides try to defeat Obama. Once he's re-elected, will they actually try and move the country forward? Or will they continue to press backward toward 1945? Hopefully, the House reverts to Democratic control and they do something about the filibuster.
 
Re: Obamanation here today

Let's see. When you have an obstructionist Congress that is more concerned about politics than our economy, what is the President to do? He isn't the first to do an end around move via Executive Orders, and he won't be the last.
It will be interesting to see how the House reacts when the 2012 vote is done and they will need to actually do something besides try to defeat Obama. Once he's re-elected, will they actually try and move the country forward? Or will they continue to press backward toward 1945? Hopefully, the House reverts to Democratic control and they do something about the filibuster.
That's what I say too...too bad zer0 can't get his democratic controlled senate to co-operate.
 

moreluck

golden ticket member
Re: Obamanation here today

| Wednesday, November 16, 2011 @ 10:59 pm | Obama Bad-Mouths American Students During Visit To Australian High School…

He never ceases to disgust me.
(Fox News) — President Obama bad-mouthed the United States during a visit to an Australian high school, telling teenagers that the United States has “fallen behind” in education, according to a White House pool report.

He told young people at Campbell High School the United States has “fallen behind” when it comes to math and science education — explaining why he made it a priority in his administration.

He also said poor American children don’t get “the support they need when they’re very young” and are “already behind” when they enter grammar school.

President Obama also told students that he is “always inspired when I meet with young people because you’re not stuck in some of the old stodgy ideas” one finds in
 
Re: Obamanation here today

So what part of that is not true?
Let's go with this one:
He also said poor American children don’t get “the support they need when they’re very young” and are “already behind” when they enter grammar school.
I guess he's never heard of the " Head Start Program". He could ask Perry, I'm sure he is familiar with it.
HEAD START ACT
 

moreluck

golden ticket member
Re: Obamanomics

obamawelfarecheck.jpg
 
Re: Obamanation here today

Head Start only goes so far. In today's world, children without access to the Internet, or even a computer, are already at a disadvantage.

Just about everyone has access to the internet, maybe not in the classroom or at home but most public libraries have free internet available. Even at that, the internet isn't always the most reliable resource for information anyway. Until the last....say 20 years, there was no such thing as the internet and lots of folks did just fine.

But that is not what you asked nor what I responded to.

"He also said poor American children don’t get “the support they need when they’re very young” and are “already behind” when they enter grammar school."

Programs like Head Start helps to rectify that.
 

Lue C Fur

Evil member
Re: Obamanation here today

Head Start only goes so far. In today's world, children without access to the Internet, or even a computer, are already at a disadvantage.

Most do have access to computers but they either trash them, steal them, or surf porn on them. Do a search on all the money that was given to Detroit public schools and what happened to all the computers. If the parent or parents dont give a crap then neither will their kids. I really think its a lost cause...
 

moreluck

golden ticket member
Re: Obamanation here today

Obama is a damn traitor. He claims to be focusing on jobs, but stopped Boeing in South Carolina. NOW, he's touting a $21.7 billion dollar Boeing deal in Indonesia.

So, he leaves our country and makes wonderful strides in jobs in other countries. What a piece of......!!!:sick:
 

moreluck

golden ticket member
Re: Obamanation here today



Apparently, I misunderstood and Obama said he brokered a deal with Boeing & Indonesia ordering some planes.......it's just a paper order now fpr $21.7 billion.....good if it happens
 

moreluck

golden ticket member
Re: Obamanation here today

(Judicial Watch) — Following a laughable United Nations declaration that high-speed internet access is a basic human right, the Obama Administration is investing north of $400 million to expand broadband into poor, rural areas of the U.S.

The president has long asserted that broadband access is essential for communities to compete on a “level playing field” and he’s included it among the necessities to improve the lives of rural Americans. The agency in charge of distributing the money — the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) — took it a step further this week, asserting that high speed internet connections will help low-income residents in a variety of unimaginable areas.

For instance, it will “improve healthcare and educational opportunities,” according to Obama’s Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack. Broadband will also help the poor “connect to global markets,” Vilsack said, and it will provide “much-needed services to rural businesses and residents.” The investment, presumably on the part of the government, will also “increase jobs” in rural areas, Vilsack assures.

Utility companies in 15 states will receive a combined $410.7 billion in grants from Uncle Sam to install or upgrade connections in rural and low-income areas that currently don’t have internet access or only have slow, dialup connections. Among them are companies in North Dakota, Minnesota, Colorado, Indiana, Kansas, New Mexico and Tennessee. It’s all part of Obama’s mission to improve the lives of rural Americans, put people back to work and build thriving economies in rural communities, according to the USDA. How exactly fast-speed internet service will help accomplish this is not explained by the agency.

Perhaps not coincidentally, the Human Rights Council of the United Nations General Assembly recently determined that, like healthcare, shelter and food, broadband access is a basic human right that allows people to “exercise their right to freedom of opinion and expression.” In a lengthy report addressing obstacles that challenge the right of all individuals to receive information through the internet, the U.N. demands that governments worldwide make the internet “widely available, accessible and affordable to all segments of the population.”
 
Top