tieguy
Banned
I wonder if the IRS will accept that answer why they come a looking. Better yet I wonder if they realize its against my religion to pay tax's.
President Obama!
- Thread starter passerby
- Start date
I wonder if the IRS will accept that answer why they come a looking. Better yet I wonder if they realize its against my religion to pay tax's.
Babagounj
Strength through joy
I wonder if the IRS will accept that answer why they come a looking. Better yet I wonder if they realize its against my religion to pay tax's.
always greet them with "allah akbar", that should do the trick.
UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)
Well-Known Member
always greet them with "allah akbar" while facing East, that should do the trick.
The Amish are another excluded.
Babagounj
Strength through joy
you should also bow really low to them, just like bho does.
diesel96
Well-Known Member
These are my boys when it comes to HealthCare ... Anthony Weiner - New York's 9th District
AMA - Health System Reform....BaBa, how long did it take you to google a disgruntled (R) Fla penis Doctor anyway....lol
klein
Für Meno :)
wkmac
Well-Known Member
Ron Paul and others should be called out for making this false claim because if one looks at the Delegation of Authorities (you can find them for public inspection at your local IRS, in the IRS District Office Reading Room or by FOIA request) the only authority in IRS to carry a weapon is with the CID division. Unless you are formally under criminal investigation (you'll know because they come out, flash the CID badge, formally read you your rights and inform you that you are officially under criminal investigation and them folks is packing), all other IRS personal that you come in contact with under non-criminal conditions (audits, inquiry and other agency actions) are unarmed and that's the vast majority of IRS personal. In fact the vast majority of gov't agency officals we typically come in contact with day in, day out are unarmed gov't employees. If you ever want to know if a gov't official is armed, ask them to provide authority to show that in their capacity and official duty, they have the power to arrest someone. If they lack that authority, they ain't packing and thus the reverse is also true.
Ron was wrong to engage in such red herrings as most of the increase in IRS personal will be along the lines of adminstration as the new healthcare plan impacts the agency's mission in the form of taxation requirements. Yes, if the new healthcare plan has a tax component, it's only common sense that the Treasury Department would add folks in order to meet those legal requirements and function. There might be a few additions to the CID ranks as a result but at this time I have no reason to believe that all 16k additions will be CID agents.
BTW Ron is not the only one to use red herrings and straw men in political discourse as in fact all of Washington does this. I do hold Ron to a higher standard and thus should know better. Shame on him and he deserves being called out! There are many, many good reasons to oppose or question this recent healthcare plan and too resort to exaggerations like this is not the answer. I'll go toe to toe with anyone who advocates even the power of gov't to license doctors much less command and control of the entire industry and for those under any illusion that our medical industry today is some true free market utopia devoid of State intervention or regulation thus to cause of the problem, you might go back and learn about the 1910' Flexner Report just as a starting point! Wonder why "DR." Ron Paul isn't doing this?
And while we're at it, why did the industry and gov't kill the old lodge practice of healthcare? Did you notice that as the effects of the Flexner Report came into play, lodge practice went away? Hmmm!And also while talking about Delegations of Authorities, all agencies of gov't have this because it's required by law in the Adminstrative Procedures Act codified in Title 5 of the US Code and 5 CFR. There is a strict procedure that agencies must follow in order to be authorized and any misstep in the process literally invalidates the actions of the agency in that realm. But you have to call them on it and you'd be surprised how often they do not comply with all aspects of required law but be forewarned, they do not like it at all when you do called them out.
jmo
Babagounj
Strength through joy
yes but to be Amish , one would have to give up the internet.
I like the fact that bho has declared to the world that the USA is a muslim country, thus we are all exempt form Obamacare.
Babagounj
Strength through joy
unlike you I use another search engine, one that does not block anti-bho sites.
The Thinking Search: Now makes informed recommendations for results WEB Blogs Feeds Twitter ASK me Images Flickr Weather Map Traffic IP Daily BUZZ Tech BUZZ Hacks BUZZ Sports BUZZ
Babagounj
Strength through joy
he danced around that question better than Fred Astaire.
he included some blame bush nonsense too.
I like the part about if your house has a hole in its roof, like that had anything to do with the question.
Lue C Fur
Evil member
This is typical for the Messiah. He has 20 mins alloted to speak and will blow smoke and stumble around the question and never actually answer it until the time is up. Most politicians do "the dance" so the Messiah is not the first but Odrama takes it to the next level. The main stream media lapdogs just lap it up.
Babagounj
Strength through joy
http://www.examiner.com/x-37620-Con...e-House-to-mediaDont-report-what-you-discover
White House to media--'Don't report what you discover'
April 5, 5:31 PM Anthony G. Martin
In light of numbing revelations over the last several days concerning fraudulent statements on Barack Obama's resume, this piece of information curiously comes to light. The White House has instructed the 'mainstream media' not to report what they may discover.
In exchange for being given unprecedented access to Barack Obama, reporters would promise not to report 'certain matters' they may discover while covering the President.
White House to media--'Don't report what you discover'
April 5, 5:31 PM Anthony G. Martin
In light of numbing revelations over the last several days concerning fraudulent statements on Barack Obama's resume, this piece of information curiously comes to light. The White House has instructed the 'mainstream media' not to report what they may discover.
In exchange for being given unprecedented access to Barack Obama, reporters would promise not to report 'certain matters' they may discover while covering the President.
Lue C Fur
Evil member
The Messiah's Lap dog media does not suprise me:
The agreement between the White House and reporters is mutually beneficial. The White House gets what it wants. Any information that it considers to be negative or damaging to Obama will not be reported. The reporters also get what they want--unprecedented access to the President of the United States, which will help their careers and eventually earn them millions in book royalties.
In the meantime, what are the citizens not being told about Barack Obama?
wkmac
Well-Known Member
tieguy
Banned
The story is believable. In one week I saw Matt Lauer do a positive interview with Obama, then the clark kellogg shoot around before the final four followed by a very unusual very positive piece on meet the press. Unprecedented access is a great description.
wkmac
Well-Known Member
Similar threads
