The company can not think that they will be able to move all the packages using PVD's.
Nah, but they sure could blunt the Union's power with what they can move.
The company can not think that they will be able to move all the packages using PVD's.
That is why the wording in the contract is going to be so IMPORTANT!!! The company can not think that they will be able to move all the packages using PVD's. No one in Atlanta is that dense!
Nah, but they sure could blunt the Union's power with what they can move.
The problem being is how are PVD's going to deliver bulk business, or even any business, out of a car, or even light duty, non-commercial pick up.
I don't like the idea any more than anyone else does, but, if these are "seasonal" UPS employees, as described in Article 1 Section 1 of the Central Region Supplement, how can you say it is subcontracting?
That is why the wording in the contract is going to be so IMPORTANT!!!
No, but I think that Article 18 of the Master might???....I don't like the idea any more than anyone else does, but, if these are "seasonal" UPS employees, as described in Article 1 Section 1 of the Central Region Supplement, how can you say it is subcontracting?
We hire seasonals every year and put them in a brown truck, by themselves. The Central does not say they have to drive a brown truck, does it?
I am by no means for this, but, contractually, I don't see an issue unless they use them after January 15.
If H&H won't do anything about it, I don't see that we can locally.
No, but I think that Article 18 of the Master might???....
....or at least a suitable rental.
Lots of language about the vehicles we drive and how they are to be maintained.
Not sure someone's 2001 Chevy Astro Van fits the bill.
We don't need them being seasonal either!Not bad.
Although Article 18 starts off by saying the employer will not "require" an employee.......
If the employee agrees to drive it, as long as it is not red tagged, does Article 18 still apply?
Does Article 18 apply to employees driving their personal vehicles?
If you recall, Article 40 even has a provision for air drivers driving their personal vehicles.
But keep up the good work. We need to keep these PVD's from operating outside of "seasonal."
Are you forgetting about the "vacation replacement" period in the Central Region Supplement?But keep up the good work. We need to keep these PVD's from operating outside of "seasonal."
They will be delivering residential stops only.
They will be delivering residential stops only.
Yea, no chance they will slip in a few commercial stops to eliminate a route or two.to start out with
We don't need them being seasonal either!
Are you forgetting about the "vacation replacement" period in the Central Region Supplement?
If we accept "seasonals", what argument will forbid these "vacation replacement" drivers being used in the same manner all summer long?
Yea, no chance they will slip in a few commercial stops to eliminate a route or two.
What's there to stop them?
Any chance this rhetoric was only thrown out there to soften us up?
WhAt are we going to get in return.... that is the question!!!Seasonal deliver business stops.
PVD's would just be doing it in their car instead of a UPS truck.
I think we need to focus on how to strictly keep them seasonal, if we can't stop them altogether.
I think we need to focus on how to strictly keep them seasonal, if we can't stop them altogether.
WhAt are we going to get in return.... that is the question!!!
UPS clearly is not concerned with the possibility of having grievances filed on PVDs. How do you put a value on the information & data that UPS will gather?
When we all know it will be used, in the event the Teamsters ever have the courage to strike the company again.