Rittenhouse Trial

[UnionStrong]

Yeah, that's sort of going off onto a Trumpee tangent.

I’m trying to follow left wing logic

 

[UnionStrong]

Yeah, that's sort of going off onto a Trumpee tangent.

Don’t you start

 

[bbsam]

Not at all. You’re grasping at straws like the prosecution

This is the formula presented

Follow closely. Everything in my scenario fits and yet it doesn’t make sense because the formula itself is flawed. It’s too simplistic and in the Rittenhouse scenario most are likely to answer “No!” The scenario I put forth that satisfies all the criteria most would answer “Yes!”

 

[bbsam]

The man shot in self defense. Period. The fact that he killed a child rapist is a bonus.

It’s irrelevant.

 

[UnionStrong]

This is the formula presented
View attachment 359243
Follow closely. Everything in my scenario fits and yet it doesn’t make sense because the formula itself is flawed. It’s too simplistic and in the Rittenhouse scenario most are likely to answer “No!” The scenario I put forth that satisfies all the criteria most would answer “Yes!”

It does not matter. If someone tries to kill you, you have the right to defend yourself. Those animals were violating a curfew so they had no right to be there either

 

[UnionStrong]

It’s irrelevant.

Bonus points

 

[UnionStrong]

This is the formula presented
View attachment 359243
Follow closely. Everything in my scenario fits and yet it doesn’t make sense because the formula itself is flawed. It’s too simplistic and in the Rittenhouse scenario most are likely to answer “No!” The scenario I put forth that satisfies all the criteria most would answer “Yes!”

No it doesn’t

 

[Box Ox]

This is the formula presented
View attachment 359243
Follow closely. Everything in my scenario fits and yet it doesn’t make sense because the formula itself is flawed. It’s too simplistic and in the Rittenhouse scenario most are likely to answer “No!” The scenario I put forth that satisfies all the criteria most would answer “Yes!”

I'm not sure where you're seeing Rittenhouse as being like a guy who's been having a fling with some guy's wife in this.

Per the New York Times:

Shooting 1:

Shootings 2 and 3:

Just watch those small parts real quick and tell us again that what you see in those videos is Rittenhouse committing murders.

 

[UnionStrong]

I'm not sure where you're seeing Rittenhouse as being like a guy who's been having a fling with some guy's wife in this.

Per the New York Times:

Shooting 1:

Shootings 2 and 3:

Just watch those small parts real quick and tell us again that what you see in those videos is Rittenhouse committing murders.

You’re wasting your time

 

[El Correcto]

@Box Ox if you come home and find a guy having a fling with your wife, should he be there? If, in a fit of rage, you attack him but he’s able to get to his gun laying with his discarded clothing and shoots you dead, is it murder?

No. Clearly invited by the wife who is a resident of the property.

 

[wilberforce15]

View attachment 359231
Kyle bored with the prosecution.

View attachment 359232
Kyle using the “Balling Like A Bitch” defense.

You just mad he shot some pedos?

 

[BrownFlush]

Please... Do not allow Kyle's Mom to be interviewed again.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

I don't believe he will face life in prison, but he is guilty of killing those two young men. You can not deny that fact.

I agree, he is guilty of killing those two men in self-defense.

 

[upsgrunt]

I agree, he is guilty of killing those two men in self-defense.

So, wouldn’t the correct term be “he is responsible for killing two men in self-defense”?

 

[Old Man Jingles]

So, wouldn’t the correct term be “he is responsible for killing two men in self-defense”?

If you kill someone, you killed 'um.

 

[upsgrunt]

If you kill someone, you killed 'um.

But guilty implies that he was in the wrong. Self defense erases guilty. I’m no lawyer; just picking your brain.

 

[cachmeifucan]

Tucker Carlson said Rosenbaum died like he lived- trying to touch a minor.

If that isn't a slam dunk for Rittenhouse I don't know what is.

The pos was found guilty of anal rape. Thanks for justice the victim is probably happy he wont rape again

 

[cachmeifucan]

@Box Ox if you come home and find a guy having a fling with your wife, should he be there? If, in a fit of rage, you attack him but he’s able to get to his gun laying with his discarded clothing and shoots you dead, is it murder?

Nope

 

[Old Man Jingles]

But guilty implies that he was in the wrong. Self defense erases guilty. I’m no lawyer; just picking your brain.

I'm guilty of replying to you and I'm no lawyer either but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.

 

[rod]

Nope

shoot the wife too