DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
Rosenbaum said he was going to kill Rittenhouse. Later, he tried to kill Rittenhouse. Rittenhouse killed him in self defense.
Where are you getting lost?
Rittenhouse Trial
- Thread starter El Correcto
- Start date
-
- Tags
- saint
Where are you getting lost?
wilberforce15
Well-Known Member
what I find most fascinating is how bad the coverage is.
A significant number of blue-checks on Twitter are now finding out that the guys killed were white pedophiles, not black thugs.
A significant number of blue-checks on Twitter are now finding out that the guys killed were white pedophiles, not black thugs.
El Correcto
god is dead
Kyle showed much more restraint than I would of with rosenbaum. I would not even tried to flee rosenbaum. I would of dumped a mag into him with out a moments hesitation, especially with the previous threats he had made and was now acting like he was gonna follow through. I sure as hell wouldn’t of stopped afterwards to offer medical aid. Kyle has a good heart and I believe the kid when he says he didn’t want to shoot anyone before breaking down.
El Correcto
god is dead
Show us the video evidence, dead men tell no tales.
Fred's Myth
Nonhyphenated American
Or even George Zimmerman!
MAKAVELI
Well-Known Member
Zimmerman was the aggressor. That is proven. Now answer the question.
Rittenhouse shouldn't have been in Kenosha that night just like Zimmerman shouldn't have gotten out of the car. But he'll still be found not guilty of murder just like Zimmerman was. And there's far more evidence in support of the defense in this case.
The George Zimmerman Trial: An Account
Welcome to Famous Trials, the Web’s largest and most visited collection of original essays, trial transcripts and exhibits, maps, images, and other materials relating to the greatest trials in world history. “Famous Trials” first appeared on the Web in 1995, making this site older than about...
"The jurors supporting the not guilty verdict proved to be the more persuasive, arguing that whether or not Zimmerman profiled Martin, or was foolish in following him, was legally irrelevant to the charges. As the deliberations progressed, the jurors initially inclined to find Zimmerman guilty came around to the view that "the law says at the end of the day all that mattered is who was on top on who was on the bottom"--and the evidence suggested Martin was on top and Zimmerman on the bottom (or, at the very least, there was a reasonable basis for believing that to be the case). After sixteen hours of debating the evidence, the jury returned its verdict of "not guilty."
In an interview with CNN's Anderson Cooper three days after the trial ended, a juror identified only as "Juror B37" offered her view of the case. She described George Zimmerman as "a man whose heart was in the right place, but went above and beyond what he really should have done." She added, "If anything, Zimmerman was guilty of not using good judgment...When he was in the car, and he had called 911, he shouldn't have gotten out of that car." None of the jurors, she told Anderson, "thought race played a role. We never had that discussion." In her analysis of the evidence, "Trayvon decided that he wasn't going to let him scare him ... and I think Trayvon got mad and attacked him." Citing Florida law, Juror B37 concluded Zimmerman "had a right to defend himself. If he felt threatened that his life was going to be taken away from him, or he was going to have bodily harm, he had a right." Stating the obvious, she said, "It's a tragedy this happened. But it happened."
El Correcto
god is dead
Evidence showed Trayvon Martin was the aggressor
What many blacks and liberals will never publicly acknowledge is that Trayvon Martin’s death was a consequence of his own criminal conduct (“‘Life has got to be of some value,'…
www.baltimoresun.com
MAKAVELI
Well-Known Member
So did Rosenbaum then.
Fred's Myth
Nonhyphenated American
He aggressed from underneath Trayvon?
MAKAVELI
Well-Known Member
Your link brings up tonight's game. LolNo it isn’t.Evidence showed Trayvon Martin was the aggressor
What many blacks and liberals will never publicly acknowledge is that Trayvon Martin’s death was a consequence of his own criminal conduct (“‘Life has got to be of some value,'…
Anyway , Zimmerman was the aggressor. That is fact.
MAKAVELI
Well-Known Member
Was it Trayvon's fault Zimmerman couldn't fight?
El Correcto
god is dead
What many blacks and liberals will never publicly acknowledge is that Trayvon Martin's death was a consequence of his own criminal conduct ("'Life has got to be of some value,'" July 21). For a multitude of reasons, people make other people angry every day. Yet no one has the right to physically assault someone simply because that someone has said or done something to make him angry. The prosecution in the George Zimmerman murder trial referred to Mr. Martin as a "child," as if he were seven instead of 17 years old. The national media repeatedly referred to him as an "unarmed teenager," as if a well-built 17-year-old could not possibly harm someone with his fists or by pounding his head onto a concrete sidewalk.
If, after punching Mr. Zimmerman, Mr. Martin had been shot while fleeing, that would have constituted second-degree murder or manslaughter. But that is not what happened. The evidence is irrefutable that Mr. Martin initiated and perpetuated the physical confrontation. He certainly wasn't shot before he attacked Mr. Zimmerman. He certainly wasn't punched by Mr. Zimmerman — either before or during the attack — because there were no marks on Mr. Martin's face or body to indicate that he was struck even once. Clearly, Mr. Martin did all the punching. He committed assault (with his fists) and battery (with the concrete sidewalk) because Mr. Zimmerman committed the mortal sin of making him angry.
Evidence showed Trayvon Martin was the aggressor
What many blacks and liberals will never publicly acknowledge is that Trayvon Martin’s death was a consequence of his own criminal conduct (“‘Life has got to be of some value,'…
www.baltimoresun.com
Fred's Myth
Nonhyphenated American
What act of aggression did Rittenhouse make towards Rosenbaum?
MAKAVELI
Well-Known Member
Buying ice tea and Skittles is aggression?
The George Zimmerman Trial: An Account
Welcome to Famous Trials, the Web’s largest and most visited collection of original essays, trial transcripts and exhibits, maps, images, and other materials relating to the greatest trials in world history. “Famous Trials” first appeared on the Web in 1995, making this site older than about...
"Zimmerman's version of events is largely consistent with the statement of eyewitness Jonathan Good, a resident of one of the townhouses close to the site of the fight, and the observer closest to the confrontation and considered by police to be its most reliable eyewitness. Hearing noise outside his residence, Goodr opened a sliding door to hear cries of "Help, help, help" and see a person wearing a dark sweatshirt on top of a person wearing a "lighter colored"--perhaps "red or white," he guessed (Zimmerman actually wore an orange zip-up sweatshirt)--"shirt or sweatshirt or whatever." Good told police, "The black guy was on top" and "the guy that was on the ground under him...was definitely a lighter color." As Good ran to call 9-1-1 he heard the sound of gunfire. When he looked outside again, Good saw "two gentlemen with flashlights asking what was going on and the one guy that was on the bottom said I shot the other guy in self-defense.""
Fred's Myth
Nonhyphenated American
Zimmerman was the agitator, Martin was the aggressor.
MAKAVELI
Well-Known Member
Rosenbaum was the agitator, Rittenhouse was the aggressor.
Fred's Myth
Nonhyphenated American
“ A gunshot was fired into the air by a third party and, according to a witness, an unarmed Rosenbaum lunged at Rittenhouse and attempted to take his rifle.[“
That is an act of aggression by Rosenbaum.
Similar threads
