Rittenhouse Trial

[vantexan]

Yes, when the man is still engaged in teh fight after trying to kill you, establishing distance and getting a clean shot is not only defensible, it's the best course of action.

Sure, if he charged him. Got proof? Eyewitnesses beyond the men involved?

 

[wilberforce15]

Sure, if he charged him. Got proof? Eyewitnesses beyond the men involved.

Very clear. Arbery approached and initiated, fought, wrestled, and kept coming. This isn't even close to difficult.

 

[vantexan]

If you do, I'll wait for the sheriff politely and peacefully, and then press charges for knowingly falsifying a report.

Oh, no you won't. I saw that evil look you gave me and decided it was my right to neutralize the threat!

 

[vantexan]

Very clear. Arbery approached and initiated, fought, wrestled, and kept coming. This isn't even close to difficult.

Got that on video or are you just taking the shooter's word? I don't remember them having video of the actual shot. Obscured by their vehicle.

 

[wilberforce15]

Oh, no you won't. I saw that evil look you gave me and decided it was my right to neutralize the threat!

they killed him because he tried to kill them, and it's literally on video, bruh.

 

[wilberforce15]

Got that on video or are you just taking the shooter's word? I don't really them having video of the actual shot. Obscured by their vehicle.

Doens't matter if the shot is on video.

Arbery initiating, wrestling, and trying to kill them is on video.

 

[vantexan]

Doens't matter if the shot is on video.

Arbery initiating, wrestling, and trying to kill them is on video.

Court may determine they drove up with guns drawn which initiated the fight.

 

[wilberforce15]

Court may determine they drove up with guns drawn which initiated the fight.

no, they were parked. he closed all distance

 

[wilberforce15]

They:

Parked far away.
Didn't chase him down.
Didn't shoot him when he approached.
Didn't shoot him when he initiated contact.
Didn't shoot him when tried to wrestle the gun away.

What more do you want?

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

I call the cops and tell them my suspicion, offer to keep the guy in sight until they arrive. There's an active neighborhood watch, then there's vigilantism.

So people in a neighborhood watch don't have a right to self defense?

 

[Sportello]

So people in a neighborhood watch don't have a right to self defense?

Most don't have the right to engage, that's what you are suggesting.

 

[wilberforce15]

Most don't have the right to engage, that's what you are suggesting.

And these guys were parked. They didn't approach him. That's not engaging.

 

[Sportello]

The courts will decide.

 

[wilberforce15]

The courts will decide.

They've already decided. That's because they're run by ideology, not legality.

 

[Box Ox]

And these guys were parked. They didn't approach him. That's not engaging.

Yeah, they were just "parked". In the middle of the road. They didn' do nuffin! LOL

 

[wilberforce15]

Yeah, they were just "parked". In the middle of the road. They didn' do nuffin! LOL

View attachment 359756
View attachment 359759

View attachment 359757

Thanks for showing them on the side of the road.

 

[wilberforce15]

If arbery just kept 'jogging' by them, you know what would've happened?

Nothing.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

So people in a neighborhood watch don't have a right to self defense?

Most don't have the right to engage, that's what you are suggesting.

So you don't think people in a neighborhood watch have the right to engage in self defense?

 

[Sportello]

They've already decided. That's because they're run by ideology, not legality.

So you expect similar outcomes in both trials?

 

[Box Ox]

Thanks for showing them on the side of the road.

That's clearly not what that shows.