Careful, weasels are dangerous when backed into a corner.Dano's backed into a corner. Sure is pathetic watching him trying to squirm his way out.
Careful, weasels are dangerous when backed into a corner.Dano's backed into a corner. Sure is pathetic watching him trying to squirm his way out.
That's what I'm here for.
If my experiences contradict the "empirical data", logic would suggest
I know! Why talk about something you aren't familiar with?Oh man, you talking about logic!![]()
Dano's backed into a corner. Sure is pathetic watching him trying to squirm his way out.
I know! Why talk about something you aren't familiar with?
So, now that that's cleared up, why do you have access to empirical data? Are you the artful dodger? Enlighten us!Hard to argue with a guy who makes as much sense as you do! I'd trade places with you in a heartbeat.
why do you have access to empirical data?
If you are so certain couriers not running at 98% or better are cheating the company then cite the data proving it. Otherwise you are shooting off your mouth with nothing backing you up.Who says I do? Or don't, for that matter?
If you are so certain couriers not running at 98% or better are cheating the company then cite the data proving it.
So, now that that's cleared up, why do you have access to empirical data? Are you the artful dodger? Enlighten us!
Gee, sounds like you're saying if they aren't hitting 98% or better they're cheating the company and should be fired. Of course it can never be that management is pushing people to do more by adjusting their rt goals, huh?Well you were obviously falsifying, because everyone here has told me that the only way to blow up a route like that is to falsify. I don't believe them, but they keep saying it so it must be true!
That aside, the easy way to fix that kind of problem is to get rid of couriers who can't make goal. Give them 3 months to do so. If they haven't made positive progress at the end of 3 months or hit 98% or above, adios. Something like that.
Gee, sounds like you are saying couriers not hitting 98% or better aren't giving an honest effoet, I.E. cheating the company.I dunno, make an honest effort?
Well it could be like our station, where courier names and percentages are posted daily...If you are so certain couriers not running at 98% or better are cheating the company then cite the data proving it. Otherwise you are shooting off your mouth with nothing backing you up.
They put out the numbers daily here too. No doubt some couriers are milkers. Some couriers just can't perform at a certain level even though they try. And then there are couriers who do a great job and management adjusts their rt goals to see if they can squeeze even more productivity out of them. As we all know the couriers who perform well are always pushed to do more because the mgrs can count on them. Ends up having good people getting burned out trying to please the boss. If Dano is a courier then he makes a mistake assuming that his experience applies across the board to all stations. Every station I've been to has unique challenges, although much is the same. My experience suggests that the quality of your work and workplace is affected the most by your management team.Well it could be like our station, where courier names and percentages are posted daily...
even though the practice has been pretty much eliminated in all other locations, since it can be seen as harassment or whatever to those who have lower numbers, being seen by co-workers. Basically putting your performance out in the open for all to judge. So it's probable he has the same access, my guess is DANO is an AIM/ASSPIRE courier who has access to GAP reports and other metrics, but will never get the position because we have too many managers, until the next round of cuts.
The way it should be.Our numbers are posted daily. Only look at mine; couldn't care less about anyone else's numbers.
The way it should be.
Yet Dano shows tremendous concern for every courier's numbers across the country
Did your nephew in the 3rd grade provide you with guidance on that post?You just get dumber and dumber and dumber.
You just get dumber and dumber and dumber.