L
Are you unable to compare and contrast?question was avoided, of course...
Are you unable to compare and contrast?question was avoided, of course...
L
Are you unable to compare and contrast?
It's obvious. The GP reads the news and tells you what to believe. Like you aren't able to handle the entire story and so you walk away feeling oddly superior in ignorant bliss. But if that's what you like...are you unable to answer the question??? again???
It's obvious. The GP reads the news and tells you what to believe. Like you aren't able to handle the entire story and so you walk away feeling oddly superior in ignorant bliss. But if that's what you like...
We don't answer each other's questions. I've asked him numerous times if he was this accepting of law enforcement at Ruby Ridge and Waco. Still no answer.He didn't tell me what to believe... and you still haven't answered his question... Again
"Why are you so wanting the cop to have shot Mike Brown while his hands were up?
You are not looking at the evidence. You have some kind of agenda against the police or white people because you refuse to look at any reasonable testimony"
We don't answer each other's questions. I've asked him numerous times if he was this accepting of law enforcement at Ruby Ridge and Waco. Still no answer.
Ah. But a relevant question in the question of abusive law enforcement. A question you and oldngray would rather evade. The situations aren't dissimilar and in both those cases law enforcement agencies were held accountable. Why should the truth in this case not be as vigorously uncovered?focus, that's not the subject line
Ah. But a relevant question in the question of abusive law enforcement. A question you and oldngray would rather evade. The situations aren't dissimilar and in both those cases law enforcement agencies were held accountable. Why should the truth in this case not be as vigorously uncovered?
Yes. Of course. Keep it in a small echo chamber of limited thought and it all makes perfect sense, eh Dr?Ferguson is no where near Texas... please stay on topic
Yes. Of course. Keep it in a small echo chamber of limited thought and it all makes perfect sense, eh Dr?
No. I think law enforcement has, does, and will continue to cross lines and needs to be scrutinized continually and vigorously.Don't you think the bombing in OKC made up for your "unruly FEDERAL operations?"
No. I think law enforcement has, does, and will continue to cross lines and needs to be scrutinized continually and vigorously.
I ignore noone. But you certainly don't have to engage me in conversation. That is completely up to you.WOW, your a nut case... please add me to your ignore list. I have completely lost ALL and ANY respect for any of your comments...
You somehow believe that I was condoning that terroism? I said nothing of the sort nor do I. You insinuated that ignorance and I flatly rejected it. That's what "no" means.I ignore noone. But you certainly don't have to engage me in conversation. That is completely up to you.
We don't answer each other's questions. I've asked him numerous times if he was this accepting of law enforcement at Ruby Ridge and Waco. Still no answer.
The police over stepped their authority and good reason in both of those cases.We don't answer each other's questions. I've asked him numerous times if he was this accepting of law enforcement at Ruby Ridge and Waco. Still no answer.
The police over stepped their authority and good reason in both of those cases.
Happy now.
When Should You Shoot A Cop? If you have no plans to watch this through and can only knee jerk to the title, well arguing from ignorance never stopped many of you so have at it. This will be interesting to watch on many levels.