guns

[realbrown1]

you're right. It's not for me to say. Go ahead and suffer if you insist.

Or you could just drop you lame fear of guns and I'd be cool.

 

[moreluck]

I prefer bigot.

 

[MAKAVELI]

I prefer bigot.

I think racist is more appropriate.

 

[realbrown1]

so you are "suffering" because you cant have a fully automatic Machine Gun,or Grenades,or Claymores?

Yep. And 15 and 30 round magazines for my guns.

The government trusted me with all of the above and more when I was in the military.

And I've done nothing since then to give any reason to lose that trust.

 

[moreluck]

When did the queen die and make you in charge of titles?

 

[MAKAVELI]

When did the queen die and make you in charge of titles?

If you can't take it then don't dish it out.

 

[Rainman]

Gun laws, effective or not, do not make law abiding citizens suffer.

I guess we will have to agree to disagree.


Kmart sux. So does Walmart. And Orion.

 

[bbsam]

I prefer bigot.

you don't get to choose.

 

[realbrown1]

you don't get to choose.

Neither do you.

 

[bbsam]

I guess we will have to agree to disagree.


Kmart sux. So does Walmart. And Orion.

That's fine. But I doubt you have the slightest real notion of what "suffering" is if the constitutional restrictions placed on gun ownership fits your definition.

 

[bbsam]

Neither do you.

I didn't try to. She did. Maybe you should follow along more closely if you want to jump in.

 

[moreluck]

She did ?.........

 

[bbsam]

I prefer bigot.

yes. You did.

 

[728ups]

How does the new Georgia must carry law conflict with stores like Target banning guns?

businesses can decide to prohibit weapons on premises
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/01/georgia-gun-law_n_5548804.html

 

[wayfair]

looks like Target finally came to its senses

That's their right. I'll no longer endanger them with my business

 

[728ups]

That's their right. I'll no longer endanger them with my business

i chose to do the same with Hobby Lobby

 

[oldngray]

Gov. Chris Christie vetoed a gun control bill Wednesday that would have banned ammunition magazines holding more than 10 rounds.
In his veto message, the Republican governor rejected the idea that limiting the number of bullets that guns can hold will put an end to mass shootings, calling it a "simplistic" and "trivial" approach. The bill would have reduced the legal ammunition capacity from 15 to 10 rounds.
http://townhall.com/news/politics-e...e-vetoes-gun-magazine-reduction-bill-n1858405

 

[MAKAVELI]

That's their right. I'll no longer endanger them with my business

My guess is if you feel the need to bring a gun into the store, they are not worried about your business.

 

[728ups]

 

[Rainman]

That's fine. But I doubt you have the slightest real notion of what "suffering" is if the constitutional restrictions placed on gun ownership fits your definition.

The constitution doesn't place restrictions on gun ownership. If you can find a place where it does, please enlighten me.


Kmart sux. So does Walmart. And Orion.