There seems to be too much evidence against this person (Zimmerman) with what the media is reporting and his
garbled comments recorded on 911 recordings, and past 911 reports.
To past judgement is wrong, BUT something does not add up.
Am I allowed a thought not based on fact?
Seems this person was a frustrated zealot, and went overboard and let his pent up frustations cloud his actions.
I do not know. I suspect / speculate.
If I was in Nigera, where bombs and shootings occur daily against non-Muslims and a person was
in my area who fit the typical silhoutte / image of a terrorist (I know, now it is militant) I would be on edge, cautious.
Yet I can understand his mentality for a second, but not his actions or follow-up.
Where I live, It is not wise to go certain areas of my community. Many MANY shootings, robberies come at the hands
of armed 17 year olds or younger. It is in the paper all the time here.
But if one who I wonder about leaves and I report it as the area watch, I would not follow this person on foot armed.
No matter my frustation over things, I am not deputized / authorized to persue an individual I suspect as a watchman.
I can sort of relate to this watchman's thoughts, yet he should have remained in his vehicle armed / protected and waited
for those authorized to persue / investigate.
I was not there. I do not know. But I can very well understand BBsam and others outrage.
It is very VERY possible that this was an innocent young man murdered unnecessarily by someone who was NOT
authorized to use force in investigation / pursuit.
Very sad.