M
MenInBrown
Guest
You gonna answer the concerns of your fellow teamsters are just be a coward and avoid all serious questions.
He/she is not a teamster.
You gonna answer the concerns of your fellow teamsters are just be a coward and avoid all serious questions.
Somebody help me out. I am looking through my contract book but can’t find the part about your daily guarantee of 8 hrs. I see the new language in 22.4, but what about the old language? I’m wondering if “as long as work is available” really means they can lay off RPCDs.
If even one 22.4 works, no RPCDs can be laid off.
Correct that language is a joke or am I reading it wrong (if you have 25 full time years in and under the age of 57) and for some medical or emergency reason decide to retire under the IBT/UPS formula you get less than a part timer for the same service years?
The part time (UPS Pension Plan) formula is wrong in the contract, read it 35 years X 60 = 2100 not 22.50 and they have professionals proof read these things. Also please read the fine print that extra 5 dollars starts in 2008 and not at your original seniority date. So all those part timers who have the time in you just got a 50 dollar a month bump on your pension benefits, full timers got a 500 increase under the IBT/UPS plan. We do not know about if there is any improvement with the retiree's Health and Welfare coverages, still thinking it will not change and be 300 dollars a month with spousal coverage.
I just scanned the agreement and it appears that an extra 50 cents per hour is going into the full timers Pension and Health and Welfare for a grand total of 1 dollar. The change I noticed is that part timers will only be getting an extra 30 cents into theirs? What that means besides saving the company contribution money I have no clue. Also the last two years of the contract the Health and Welfare plans if needed can get into your monetary pension increases if costs skyrocket.
The formula for the IBT/UPS plan for those with 20 years of service and 60 will not go up sit did from the last contract. It is stuck at 175 for the next five years. During the proposal talks in my local I asked that it would be stated in the Master the exact monetary contributions that would be going weekly into our Pension and Health and Welfare plans. It was done previous in past contracts clearly stated..Why isn't it now? Last I heard it is over 400 per full time employee in each (800+ total), a lot of money. Please before you vote research it out and decide if you are getting your money's worth with this contract.
We also have to see how UPS Freight and the Chicago locals are doing with their negotiations by the end of this week. I do not expect much from the supplements considering it would be the same people who negotiated this contract, hope to be pleasantly surprised but I am a realist and see this one as rehash 2013 or worst 1982.
Bitch slap them...Our “local reps” will be out front handing out flyers w how great this is
Damn...They banned him.
Again.
“As long as there’s work available” is very concerning. But in my center that Saturday work doesn’t really seem to effect layoffs on Monday layoffs. they beg Tues-Sat guys to come in on Mondays & get paid double time. So not sure sure the new 22.4 guys on Sunday will run down Tuesday work like that too. Can’t call it......But it...voting NO.
Could have a riot on our hands when the “hybrids” stand up and try to take over....Just wait till the weekend guys are being paid with peanuts.
Do you suppose the company scaled back the work to conceal the upcoming possibility that ft drivers will get laid off at a higher percentage if this passes?“As long as there’s work available” is very concerning. But in my center that Saturday work doesn’t really seem to effect layoffs on Monday layoffs.
$175 has not gone up a dime, and only $5 in the 10 years of the last 2 contracts. For me, that is how mine will be calculated. A bit disappointed with that.How about the increase in your pension? Are you interested in a pension?
It should read " No rpcd driver shall be laid off or displaced when any 22.4 driver is on road" and not "in building" subsection 4I'd be surprised if no one has asked you this yet, but if not, I will. Give me an honest answer.
What do you think was the company's intent in the language behind 22.4 drivers not being covered by 9.5 protections, in conjunction with the "as long as work is available" language that was added to the 40 hours a week, 8 hours a day guarantee for RPCDs?
They banned him.
Again.
It should read " No rpcd driver shall be laid off or displaced when any 22.4 driver is on road" and not "in building" subsection 4
Was there anything in there about us loosing the day after thanksgiving???
The UPS/IBT Plan will recognize full-time service in the CS Plan for determining eligibility for the benefits in this section and will offset at Normal Retirement Age the benefits accrued from the CS Plan commencing at Normal Retirement Age. If the benefit paid from the CS Plan is reduced as permitted or required by law, the amount of such reduction shall not be included in this offset.
Ha ha....
Bunch of idiots.
Nothing changed
Because people were concerned about losing a big portion of their pension due to the all but inevitable collapse of Central States that makes them an idiot?