UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)
Well-Known Member
That is so ridiculous it's comical.
Especially considering the fact that Troy, NY, is a very dark city.
That is so ridiculous it's comical.
That's a really piss poor article on the shooting in Utah."While national news media continue to focus on race in Ferguson, Missouri, where a white police officer shot and killed an unarmed black teenager, they apparently don’t think a similar case in Utah with the races reversed is that newsworthy."
http://www.wnd.com/2014/08/black-cop-kills-white-man-media-hide-race/
That's a really piss poor article on the shooting in Utah.
You should do some research on it and you'll start to understand how different the two shootings are. The shooting in Utah sadly is an all too common occurrence, and in general lacks the kind of controversy the Ferguson shooting does.
Not to mention the cop in Utah was wearing a body camera and I doubt the media wants to come out speculating on what happened and look like idiots when the video is released.
There is a body camera video of the shooting in the Utah case. It hasn't been released yet. They can speculate all day long about the Ferguson case because we won't ever know what really happened there.As compared to the media speculating about Ferguson and looking like idiots there?
There is a body camera video of the shooting in the Utah case. It hasn't been released yet. They can speculate all day long about the Ferguson case because we won't ever know what really happened there.
But there's so much commercial time to be sold....It is still unethical for media to make wild speculations about what happened at Ferguson without knowing the facts. The investigation is still underway and while there isn't a body camera recording the other evidence can still be pieced together to figure out what probably did or didn't happen. It just takes time so it is wrong for media to immediately jump to conclusions.
You mean that the MSM has been lying all these years ?But there's so much commercial time to be sold....
I'd say only about 5% of what you see on cable tv news is actually real news. So in that sense they've created a pretty big grey area when it comes to what is and isn't ethical.
Depends on your point of view.You mean that the MSM has been lying all these years ?![]()
But I always thought Walter Cronkite was being truthful .Depends on your point of view.
I see people like Bill O'reilly and Rachel Maddow as entertainment, and I do find them entertaining occasionally. However, there are a lot of viewers who think watching those shows equates to getting the news. Have they been lied to? Maybe yes, maybe no.... but probably yes.
So your sources were wrong, or are you saying that even having a minor offense meant he should be gunned down in the street?Michael Brown was never found delinquent of the juvenile equivalents of any Class A or B felony charges, and was not facing any at the time he died, a court official said this morning at a hearing on whether his juvenile records should be released.
It is not known whether Brown had ever been accused of lesser offenses; any record of those would be part of a confidential family court file.
http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/...cle_43c9bbbb-356f-5ea6-b9e2-7dde7e3e5c83.html
My sources? All I said was there was a lawsuit to find out information which is exactly what happened.So your sources were wrong, or are you saying that even having a minor offense meant he should be gunned down in the street?
"It can't be too hard to get a juvenile record in Ferguson, where in 2013 there were 10,000 more arrest warrants issued for nonviolent offenses than there were residents of the town. So you criminalize virtually everyone (or, you know, everyone black or brown or poor), then use their criminal records as your excuse for killing them in the street. It's appalling and shameful, and it's clearly the policy in Ferguson."
Looks like you got the story wrong.St. Louis City has no arrest records for Michael Brown. The fact that St. Louis County will not release his records tells a different story.
Looks like you got the story wrong.
I believe you used the word 'fact', when it wasn't. You do that a lot.No I didn't. I never claimed to know what happened. All I said was it was still being investigated. Which is still ongoing.