realbrown1
Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
Sour grapes or sore loser?
Can't wait to see your post after the officer is vindicated.
Gun control advocates in Ferguson MO
- Thread starter soberups
- Start date
Can't wait to see your post after the officer is vindicated.
They shouldnt beause Z is running around being the thug he's always been. He's not a hero and never has been.
realbrown1
Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
But Trevon was a 10X bigger thug.
So justice was served.
soberups
Pees in the brown Koolaid
He was charged with the wrong crime for political reasons. The evidence was not there for a murder conviction, but I think they could have got him on negligent homicide or 2nd degree manslaughter.
BrownArmy
Well-Known Member
This situation is one example...there are thousands of other examples.
Regardless of the race of the po-po and the race of the citizen that the po-po shot dead, there is a real disconnect between the well-armed police force and the citizens for whom the police are mandated to 'serve and protect'.
I think there needs to be a nation-wide re-think within the police ranks about when/if deadly force is necessary/warranted.
With regard to the Mike Brown case, if he was in fact trying to wrest a police officers' gun away, ask yourself, if you were the cop, what would you do?
With regard to the Mike Brown case, if Brown was in fact trying to evade the cops' illegitimate handling of his personal freedoms, what would you do?
There are just too many documented examples of unwarranted deadly force being employed by cops.
It's a pickle...
Regardless of the race of the po-po and the race of the citizen that the po-po shot dead, there is a real disconnect between the well-armed police force and the citizens for whom the police are mandated to 'serve and protect'.
I think there needs to be a nation-wide re-think within the police ranks about when/if deadly force is necessary/warranted.
With regard to the Mike Brown case, if he was in fact trying to wrest a police officers' gun away, ask yourself, if you were the cop, what would you do?
With regard to the Mike Brown case, if Brown was in fact trying to evade the cops' illegitimate handling of his personal freedoms, what would you do?
There are just too many documented examples of unwarranted deadly force being employed by cops.
It's a pickle...
Ever since his acquittal Z's been provin you wrong.
realbrown1
Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
Only because Trevon is no longer menacing the world.
BrownArmy
Well-Known Member
No, Trayvon Martin is dead, and after that fact Mssr. Zimmerman has continued to prove that he is a first-class D-bag.
do I get a second?
Babagounj
Strength through joy
The gentle giant's mom will be speaking about police brutality at the UN .
https://news.vice.com/article/mike-browns-mom-is-taking-her-sons-case-to-the-un-in-geneva
https://news.vice.com/article/mike-browns-mom-is-taking-her-sons-case-to-the-un-in-geneva
Lol. Maybe she should have spent more time raising her son to be respectful and polite, rather than being a piece of crap that she raised
realbrown1
Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
Is she going to also speak on how to beat family members with a pipe.
Because I'll tivo that.
MAKAVELI
Well-Known Member
I bet some people could say the same for you.
I bet some people could say the same for you.
Wow.....I'm shocked you'd say something like that...oh, no I'm not.
I don't give a rats fat hairy behind what people think about me. People who know me better have probably said worse from time to time.
At least I'm not 6 feet under in a box.
Screw michael brown, screw his mama's crying. You raise a thug and then are pissed when he's shot by a cop while being a thug? That's what you get, "lady"
Last edited:
MAKAVELI
Well-Known Member
You sound like a wannabe thug to me. I hope you don't have the same fate as Michael Brown.
Lmao. Wannabe thug? I bust my hump for everything I have and am responsible......but sure, your assessment is anywhere close. Knucklehead
oldngray
nowhere special
Ferguson protest leaders seek heads-up on decision
"After the verdict, no matter what it is, people are going to pour into the street — either in celebration or in rage," said Montague Simmons, chairman of the Organization for Black Struggle.
https://news.yahoo.com/ferguson-protest-leaders-seek-heads-decision-223954214.html
Does anyone believe there will be white people dancing in the streets celebrating (and rioting, burning, and looting) if the grand jury decides to not charge Wilson? Or is it more likely there will be rioting in rage by black people if Wilson isn't charged? So much for people letting the evidence decide.
"After the verdict, no matter what it is, people are going to pour into the street — either in celebration or in rage," said Montague Simmons, chairman of the Organization for Black Struggle.
https://news.yahoo.com/ferguson-protest-leaders-seek-heads-decision-223954214.html
Does anyone believe there will be white people dancing in the streets celebrating (and rioting, burning, and looting) if the grand jury decides to not charge Wilson? Or is it more likely there will be rioting in rage by black people if Wilson isn't charged? So much for people letting the evidence decide.
Nimnim
The Nim
The best answer I can give is so they don't potentially taint a jury pool releasing information as it comes out which can later be found as wrong as they find more out. The most accurate information they can provide is usually only given when it goes to court. I know there's crooked areas out there, but as an investigation is conducted, they often have to rethink and refocus, the media distributions of every little piece of information will only cause confusion and tainted opinions as we all know the general populous does not fully research and have open opinions. They tend to latch on to the first bit they agree with and it's a struggle to change it. Not the best thing in a court of law where someone is innocent until proven guilty.
Similar threads
