Parler Conservative site.

zimbomb

Well-Known Member
why? why not the op who provided us possible parler movements. common sense tells me there were a hell of a lot more Facebook and twitter uses in that capital then parler.

when you only post one possible then you appear to make the argument that they were the only ones and deserved to be suppressed .
truth be told if this was really based on media then twitter would have been banned.
Common sense tells us a social media company should avoid having geotags being published on their platform by user's unknowingly. It's not difficult to understand parler should have followed pretty standard SOP's when running a website. xenforo (bc forum platform) strips out identifiable information.
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
is it still relevant? its either MSM using it spin one perspective or its ignored as the cancel crowd kills debate.
I don’t understand why y’all whine about the MSM all the time. Go to OAN or Newsmax and play in your echo chamber. News outlets don’t have a duty to spread your bull:censored2: for you.

I mean, come on! Even Fox had to pull back from a lot of the crap.
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
Common sense tells us a social media company should avoid having geotags being published on their platform by user's unknowingly. It's not difficult to understand parler should have followed pretty standard SOP's when running a website. xenforo (bc forum platform) strips out identifiable information.

i dont think so take the porn and illegal crap off and leave everything else . I'm not sensitive i dont need someone telling me what i should see.
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
I don’t understand why y’all whine about the MSM all the time. Go to OAN or Newsmax and play in your echo chamber. News outlets don’t have a duty to spread your bull* for you.

I mean, come on! Even Fox had to pull back from a lot of the crap.
you did not respond to the post you respond to but went onto your own whine. which is usually what you do here. your attention span must be about 3 seconds. the question was is the first ammendment still relevant for the reasons i gave.
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
Are you denying that they have made those claims?
i honestly dont know squat about Q other then what your liberals try to tell us. for instance in the case of january 6th i found out the guys dressed in buffalo skins were Q. Well they were certainly harmless. I want to know who the guys in military gear were started the break in while trump was still speaking
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
i honestly dont know squat about Q other then what your liberals try to tell us. for instance in the case of january 6th i found out the guys dressed in buffalo skins were Q. Well they were certainly harmless. I want to know who the guys in military gear were started the break in while trump was still speaking
This guy?
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
This guy?
He maybe one of them though he looks like he was a loner or tag a long. One of the more commonly seen video's shows the first groups breaking in through windows. they all wore similar style miitary gear and were clearly organized and working together.
 

zubenelgenubi

I'm a star
Really? How much more pro Trump can you be than to insist he’s the savior of the country against democratic child sex traffickers and cannibalism?

Kinda like why would antifa assault the capitol dressed like Trump supporters to overthrow an election their guy won, right?

Or... It would only be pro-Trump if the stuff about satanic democrats were true. Is that what you are suggesting?
 
Top