UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)
Well-Known Member
Ill advised quota?
That's easy----none.
I really didn't want to touch this thread but here I go. I will not say whether or not I donate to united way via ups and if I do how much I give.
But I took an excerpt from wikipedia on aggressive panhandling. See how many of the criteria apply to the way ups/united way conducts its campaign. You be the judge:
.
There are thousands of charities out there. Who is trying to stop who from donating? I could care less where people put their money. However, as a UPS manager, you are in a unique position of basically being forced into donating to the UW and also strongarming your employees of doing the same to meet some ill-advised quota. So your opinion is not at all genuine, whether you want to admit that or not.
why would you brag about choosing to not help those out in need. I just don't get the selfish spiteful mentality of posters here.
The only person making me give is my father in law who died of ALS. I am hell bent and determined to make sure you and others here never have to experience what he experienced.
why would you try to discredit my giving by trying to say that someone at ups is making me give?
why would you try' to make such a post and undermine my efforts to make sure no one ever dies of that disease again?
Again, I am not standing in yours or anyones way of donating. However, there are more legitimate and certainly more "focused" charities than the UW when it comes to donating money to helping cure ALS.
You cannot admit without bias your reasons for choosing the UW, however given that 7 supervisors or managers have all attempted to strongarm me into donating in one way or another in the last 10 years I would say that is not a coincidence or anomaly.
Don't try to spin this as me being the bad guy for voicing facts on here. You chose the UW however cannot admit the real reasons for doing so. This isn't UPS, and you don't need to spin this issue.
Im not speaking of all the crazy things said on this thread but I can answer why I get offended at the cheap and selfish label. Its because that label is given simply because someone like myself who may want to give to charity, only in their own way on their own terms; NOT UPS'. I have no problem giving to charities but hate the way UPS goes about their campaign. Tie, the story about your father is touching and I can see why you passion is what it is. Heck I may have even found a new charitable cause. But will you be offended if I give to that charity directly? Not through UPS? That is my onlly beef with being labeled cheap or selfish.Of all the crazy things said on this thread why would a guy like tourist only get offended at the cheap and selfish labels?
If you're going to accuse me of spin then at least spin united way correctly. Its a vehicle to help those charities not a charity in itself.
If you have no problem with my pushing the use of united way to support those charities then why are you working to undermine the support of those legitimate charities through the united way.
If you really have no problem then your answer should be a simple one. Folks if you need an easy way to donate to your favorite charity then take advantage of the united way.
The money I encourage someone to donate to their charity through united way will help someone that needs it.
whats wrong with that?
whether or you think united way is the best at raising funds for those charities or not they are out there and they are pretty good at what they do.
why fight that?
I just don't understand why someone would hurt that starving kid , or aging citizen or person afflicted with some terrible disease just to spite their boss.
And then to come on this site and brag about it?
Its not about the money socks it s about the way mgnt makes the approach.You can't sit there and tell me you have'nt tried ever dumb tactic to try and get more.Maybe just ask once and except the answer and move on.And belive me we all suffer everyday having to deal with sups like yourself.Well put Tie. That's what it is all about. If Johnny Union was walking around asking for these donations, people would be emptying their wallets. It's always about management with these people. It's very telling, they would rather someone in need suffer just to prove a point to management..
I don't know why someone would want to brag about it other than UPS is a sketchy, bully of a company and it deserves it?.
Its not about the money socks it s about the way mgnt makes the approach.You can't sit there and tell me you have'nt tried ever dumb tactic to try and get more.Maybe just ask once and except the answer and move on.And belive me we all suffer everyday having to deal with sups like yourself.
Brag.
Harley Davidson brags about supporting MDA.
The NFL brags about the United Way and even supports commercials for the UW.
How many companies have jumped on the "pink ribbon"?
Don't isolate UPS as the only company that BRAGS about supporting an organization
I don't know why someone would want to brag about it other than UPS is a sketchy, bully of a company and it deserves it? Spiting the boss is NOT the issue; they have a quota to make and just like every other number or "goal" they need to achieve, have proven they will do whatever to make it whether legitimately or dishonestly. The boss that is selling the UW is not the problem, it's higher up the food chain (like most everything else) that is the actual problem.
Im not speaking of all the crazy things said on this thread but I can answer why I get offended at the cheap and selfish label. Its because that label is given simply because someone like myself who may want to give to charity, only in their own way on their own terms; NOT UPS'. I have no problem giving to charities but hate the way UPS goes about their campaign. Tie, the story about your father is touching and I can see why you passion is what it is. Heck I may have even found a new charitable cause. But will you be offended if I give to that charity directly? Not through UPS? That is my onlly beef with being labeled cheap or selfish.